Which means nothing in the consumer real world. It's 2023, how many 8K sets are sold?
Now you are starting to understand what I was saying and agree.According to estimates made in recent years, this year the number of consumers and sales of 8K products should be much higher than the current figure, but in reality, the quality of 8K is still not widely receptioned.
I suppose the reason for this lack of reception is due to the following:
1- Watching 8K videos and images requires very large screens.
For example, to see 8K resolution, we need televisions above 60 or 70 inches, and we cannot see a difference between 4K and 8K qualities at lower inches.
Or consider a 32-inch monitor, in a monitor of this size, we cannot see much difference between 4K and 8K qualities.
So we need very large screens to see 8K resolution.
Considering the area of today's houses, as well as the short distance between people and monitors, sometimes it is unreasonable to use very large screens.
Yep!2- The widespread use of smart mobile phones and laptops.
Today, many people spend hours using such devices during the day.
Due to their small screens, these devices do not show much difference between Full HD and Ultra HD qualities.
But I was referring to the "here and now", not years down the road of speculation. When are you personally going to support the 8K video revolution?3- 8K products are expensive.
Of course, if 8K products had many more customers than now, the price of the products would be cheaper.
And? What does that have to do with consumers now?4- There are few movies and television productions with 8K quality.
It's your words that are illogical. Right now, I can export in 8K in Resolve or Vegas Pro. No professional will migrate to Videostudio or any other consumer editor to edit. That is just wishful thinking on your part.Now consider that 8K quality will not become widespread in 10 years, then what will be the task of users who use 8K products?
They will have to wait until VideoStudio 2033 adds 8K video export!!!
Your words are illogical, VideoStudio should move forward according to today's technology.
If a user needs 8K output and doesn't have access to it in VideoStudio, don't you think they might migrate to another company's software?
On the other hand, with the addition of 8K video export, users from other companies may be attracted to VideoStudio.
Again, where are all the 8K TV's? 8K video cameras? 8K DVD's? 8K content? Do you really think that if someone spends multiple thousands of dollars on cameras, tv's, and editing software to produce 8K videos, they are really going to look at Videostudio Pro?
So when is your plan to move up to 8K technology? READ and learn something.
READ some more and learn something more.
Fix the bugs first, like I wrote, and then move on to features. Do you think that Alludo has unlimited funds it's willing to dump into Videostudio? Really? And if the software is buggy, who is going to buy it? Certainly not professionals. And hobbyists will begin to consider other software.My dear, solving problems and bugs in the current version and improving performance is one of the duties of the software development team, but this is not their only duty.
Planning to increase the capabilities and facilities of the software in the next versions is also their other task.
Yes, I also agree that the current version has some problems that need to be fixed, but this is not a reason to be indifferent to the future of the software.
You can believe what you want.I've come to believe from experience that Alludo employees read our posts.
For example, in the topic related to Video Studio 2022 Wishlist, some of the wishes that users posted for the next year's version were fulfilled in VideoStudio 2022.
By the way, you posted the first wish in this topic.
Wasn't waveforms added in VS 2022?
Or in the topic related to VideoStudio 2023 Wishlist, some of the wishes we posted were fulfilled in VideoStudio 2023.
So the development team does not ignore our requests.
There are things that need to be fixed. Do you really think a "professional" would tolerate a lot of bugs? I don't, and I am not a "professional" any more.
Oh, and you do know that certain features VS has were developed first in Pinnacle Studio and ported over, yes?
You can cherry pick all you want, but how many Feature Requests were fulfilled?
Yeah... 8K, but not in the near future. Why waste the development money, when bugs need to be fixed.
Oh, and you did see the screenshots I posted. Does VS have anything to compare? And you are talking about 8K? Really?
You really don't know much about editing software and it is showing by your statements. You can get Davinci Resolve for FREE. And where do you come up with the idea that it's specific for only industry?Wow, software like Adobe Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve are industry specific and used by film and media companies as well as large advertising companies.
I meant professional for home users.
Did you really think I meant to compare VideoStudio to software like Adobe Premiere Pro?!
Pinnacle Studio software is professional in my opinion, but professional in whose opinion?
Pinnacle Studio is truly professional for the home user, and VideoStudio is considered relatively professional for the home user due to its additional features.
Pinnacle Studio and VideoStudio are suitable for home users and small businesses, although Pinnacle Studio may also be used in industry.
Really? Sorry, you are wrong, very wrong here. I am a solo editor and have Davinci Resolve Studio 18 (yes, the paid version). And guess what, you can edit your home videos on it too!! AMAZING!!
And many content creators are using the FREE version to create content AND home movies! Yes! You can actually do that with a Free version of Davinci Resolve!! Freakin' amazing!!
You were the one to bring up professionals coming over to VS, not me. I did ask you to define "professional", didn't I?
As for Pinnacle Studio, I've used almost all their products in various forms since 2002, so I know their products quite well. The ONLY product they produced that I didn't buy was Pro One. And while their feature set is compelling, not for professional users.
And the software suffers just like VS with bugs that need to be fixed before any professional will consider using the software.
But you were referring to home users all the time? Then I ask, how many actually own and use 8K. I'm waiting....
VIDEO, and THIS.Adobe After Effects is used to create special effects and is not considered video editing software.
But the ability to do compositing, titling and special effects are all part and parcel of professional editing. But then, you weren't really referring to professional editing, but consumer editing.
Again, VS is an amazing piece of editing software. Amazing. But stop using the words "professional". It isn't. Maybe enthusiast... Download Davinci Resolve FREE and get back to me about "professional".
