Currently my system specs
- OS Win 10
- CVS 2018
- Intel I5 3570
- 16 MB memory
- Nvidia GTX 750
- 240MB SSD
- Asrock 1155 Mainboard
If i need to upgrade ?
Any advice or suggestions would be appreciated, thks
Best rgds,
Chaofei - Indonesia
Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
Chaofei
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:08 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock H61M U3S3
- processor: Intel I5-3570
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: Nvidia GTS -1050
- sound_card: Realtek onboard sound
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung 22 Inch
- Corel programs: Corel Videostudio X9 Ultimate
- Location: UK
-
asik1
- Posts: 3446
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:07 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: H170M-E D3
- processor: i5-6600
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: GTX1050-2GB
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: No hoarder
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 2K HP-27MQ
- Corel programs: VS-X9.2, 2020, 2023
- Location: Israel
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
It's all down to the type of editing.
Your system is ~10 years old, for simple trims it might be OK but for 4 overlays, FX's and graphics, who knows....
Rendering will be long and slow, but you know that already.
Updating hardware is always recommended once in a decade, I see you have GTx1050 it's OK for the moment.
Your system is ~10 years old, for simple trims it might be OK but for 4 overlays, FX's and graphics, who knows....
Rendering will be long and slow, but you know that already.
Updating hardware is always recommended once in a decade, I see you have GTx1050 it's OK for the moment.
Panasonic X900m, VXF1
-
Chaofei
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:08 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock H61M U3S3
- processor: Intel I5-3570
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: Nvidia GTS -1050
- sound_card: Realtek onboard sound
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung 22 Inch
- Corel programs: Corel Videostudio X9 Ultimate
- Location: UK
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
Thks for your advices, my GTx1050 for my sons pc play games....heheasik1 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 19, 2022 12:45 pm It's all down to the type of editing.
Your system is ~10 years old, for simple trims it might be OK but for 4 overlays, FX's and graphics, who knows....
Rendering will be long and slow, but you know that already.
Updating hardware is always recommended once in a decade, I see you have GTx1050 it's OK for the moment.
Btw, any recomend for budget Intel or Ryzen specs ?
-
pepegota
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUS TUF Z390-Plus
- processor: Intel i9 - 9900k
- ram: 64 GB
- Video Card: GTX 1660 6GB
- sound_card: On board sound
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Ben Q, "21" LCD
- Corel programs: VS 2018, VS 2019, VS 2020
- Location: USA
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
The most power you can afford. This way it will keep you solvent over longer periods of time. I have an intel i9. AMD has some good options also.
- Davidk
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:08 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUS Prime B660M-K D4
- processor: Intel core i3-12100 3_3ghz quad core processor
- ram: 16Gb
- Video Card: on-motherboard Intel UHD 730 graphics chipset
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6Tb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: HP E240c video conferencing monitor
- Corel programs: VideoStudio: 2022, 2023
- Location: Brisbane Australia
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
It's not all about "power" . . .
The hi-end gaming processors have multiple cores, threads etc - expensive - but video editing software (VS is not alone) rarely seems to use them. It's been a recurring discussion with VS for years and there's no indication that it is now or ever will be able to efficiently use those expensive multiple cores.
And for items requiring a lot of processing during edits, there is the proxy feature that any FHD and 4K/8k clips will have to use to avoid jamming up the edit process. Some hardware platforms are better than others and newer more 'featured' versions of the editor will not help (example: I ran an vsp with FHD clips in it's native form on X9, but with X10 on the same PC that vsp/clips had to have proxy files to be able to do anything with it); but for hi-res clips using proxy files naturally, you will twiddle your thumbs for a while while the proxy file(s) are generated, but after that all should be "normal".
Mostly, it's about reducing the processing times for complex tasks, like rendering. And what does affect processing time is the amount of RAM you have, and most of all the cpu clock speed of the processor you are using. More and higher respectively is better, even if it's older.
And little bit of work practice can be a significant help: rather than make long project files, break the task into sections, with the vsp for each one of which about 20 minutes or less long. Once edited and rendered, combining several final components into a single result is easy.
The hi-end gaming processors have multiple cores, threads etc - expensive - but video editing software (VS is not alone) rarely seems to use them. It's been a recurring discussion with VS for years and there's no indication that it is now or ever will be able to efficiently use those expensive multiple cores.
And for items requiring a lot of processing during edits, there is the proxy feature that any FHD and 4K/8k clips will have to use to avoid jamming up the edit process. Some hardware platforms are better than others and newer more 'featured' versions of the editor will not help (example: I ran an vsp with FHD clips in it's native form on X9, but with X10 on the same PC that vsp/clips had to have proxy files to be able to do anything with it); but for hi-res clips using proxy files naturally, you will twiddle your thumbs for a while while the proxy file(s) are generated, but after that all should be "normal".
Mostly, it's about reducing the processing times for complex tasks, like rendering. And what does affect processing time is the amount of RAM you have, and most of all the cpu clock speed of the processor you are using. More and higher respectively is better, even if it's older.
And little bit of work practice can be a significant help: rather than make long project files, break the task into sections, with the vsp for each one of which about 20 minutes or less long. Once edited and rendered, combining several final components into a single result is easy.
-
tletter
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 12:23 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: i7-3632QM
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA RTX 3080
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Corel programs: X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,2018,2019,2021
- Location: Canada
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
Corel's VideoStudio 2022 Ultimate System Requirements are a good place to start. They are as fols:Chaofei wrote: If i need to upgrade ?
- Operating system: Windows11, Windows 10, Windows 8, 64 bit only
- Processor: Core i3 or AMD A4 series for standard videos. Intel Core i7 or AMD Athlon A10 for HD and UHD videos
- RAM: 4 GB or higher, 8+ GB highly recommended for HD and UHD videos
- Graphics Card: Minimum display resolution: 1366 x 768, minimum 512 MB VRAM or higher recommended for hardware acceleration
- Sound Card: Windows-compatible sound card
- Hard drive space: Minimum 10 GB for full installation
Undoubtedly the higher performing CPU and GPU in your system, the better off you'll be if rendering 4K video, but the question is when do you reach the point of diminishing returns. For example, I noticed no difference in VS performance between a system with an AMD Ryzen 9 3950X with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER, and a system with an Intel Core i7-8086K with an NVIDIA GTX 1070. Undoubtedly because VS is unable to fully utilize the hardware.
tletter
https://www.youtube.com/user/tletter
-
tletter
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 12:23 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: i7-3632QM
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA RTX 3080
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Corel programs: X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,2018,2019,2021
- Location: Canada
Re: Minimum system requirment for Editing 4K video
The following image show VS2018 utilizing all cores in a 16 core CPU. The problem is that VS can't drive to cores to their maximum. However, it also leverages the GPU which helps speed rendering. tletterDavidk wrote: The hi-end gaming processors have multiple cores, threads etc - expensive - but video editing software (VS is not alone) rarely seems to use them.
https://www.youtube.com/user/tletter
