Can't believe they charge for this
-
gdwsr
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:24 am
- System_Drive: B
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Mac Late 2009
- processor: Intel Core 2 duo
- ram: 16 gb
- Video Card: NVIDIA GFORCE 9400 256 MB
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500 gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: IMAC
- Corel programs: Aftershot Pro 3
Can't believe they charge for this
Coral AfterShot is extremely unstable on my iMac. It is like a Beta that they charge you for feedback. I don't like Adobe's marketing model but Lightroom might still be the only way to go for a photo file manager/editor. There are so many problems I can't even list them.
-
Jutuiz
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:43 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: Intel I7
- ram: 12Gb
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 8Tb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung
Re: Can't believe they charge for this
Couldn't agree more. Not any better on W10.
-
danbern
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 12:13 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: Intel Core I5
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: Intel
- sound_card: Intel
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 5TB
- Corel programs: ASP 3.4
Re: Can't believe they charge for this
I see no reason for using ASP on Mac or Windows, since there are better alternatives.
In Linux is by far the best option. There is no other app what offers good cataloguing options AND a good RAW editor.
It works more than enough well on Debian 8 (Jessie) and Ubuntu 16.04. It is not rock solid, but it is solid enough for me.
In Linux is by far the best option. There is no other app what offers good cataloguing options AND a good RAW editor.
It works more than enough well on Debian 8 (Jessie) and Ubuntu 16.04. It is not rock solid, but it is solid enough for me.