Nikon D750 Support

[d-light]

In the recent discussion on "Version 2.1.1.9 with D750 and D810 support" it did not become clear to me. Does AfterShot Pro now support the new Nikon D750?

On the Corel page it is not in the list of supported cameras:
https://store.paintshoppro.com/1184/cat ... e=en#tab=5

Thank you for your reply and any comment on results you may have achieved with the current version of AfterShot Pro.

Cheers and best wishes for the New Year!

[afx]

Well, what would you expect after that title? Me thinks that was explicit enough.

I suggest reading the right page: http://www.aftershotpro.com/en/products ... pro/#tab=5
And Corel needs to clean up their web act...
Noise reduction is broken for the D750 using the high range, otherwise it runs fine.

cheers
afx

[d-light]

Thanks for your reply, Andreas.

Corel needs to clean up their web act...

Thats what I would expect. Once a user stumbles across https://store.paintshoppro.com/1184/cat ... e=en#tab=5 and finds the list he may not want to retrieve the complete Corel website just to find a different information.

I recently struggled with LR 5 after Aperture (3.5.1) does not support my brand new D750 under Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) and I do not yet want to update to Yosemite. Maybe I should also give the current version of AfterShotPro a try. I still have 1.2.07 installed. 39.99 EUR for an upgrade might be worth while a review of what is in the successor of Bibble and AfterShotPro 1. What do you think?

Cheers
Michael

[afx]

I recently struggled with LR 5 after Aperture (3.5.1) does not support my brand new D750 under Mac OS X 10.9.5 (Mavericks) and I do not yet want to update to Yosemite. Maybe I should also give the current version of AfterShotPro a try. I still have 1.2.07 installed. 39.99 EUR for an upgrade might be worth while a review of what is in the successor of Bibble and AfterShotPro 1. What do you think?

I currently have a mixed workflow...

Download, cull and caption/keyword with AfterShot. Doing this with LR is already way too painful.
Then it depends on image content. Images that do not hit the extremes are processed in AfterShot, the others in LightRoom. At the moment, no software really makes me happy. IQ wise I should use PictureNinja, but their way of working is so inefficient my teeth hurt.
I might have a look at C1 again next week as they seem to finally have decent regional editing support. I fear they still have totally borked I/O though.

cheers
afx

[d-light]

Download, cull and caption/keyword with AfterShot. Doing this with LR is already way too painful.
Then it depends on image content. Images that do not hit the extremes are processed in AfterShot, the others in LightRoom. At the moment, no software really makes me happy.

I am relieved to know that I am not the only person bothering with various tools.

I have been quite happy with Aperture I must say. It has some nice features with regard to file management, renaming, RAW+jpg pair handling, stacks of masters / developed versions etc. Also, the RAW processing and even the retouching /regional editing capabilities are better than what many people say or think. That may depend on the camera type, of course. With my old Nikon D200 results were good enough for my needs. Integration of e.g. Photoshop and NIK is pleasing. Performance is not as fast as AfterShot but still really good. In this regard Lightroom is a real pain. Even on my IMac with 16 GB of RAM and OS running on SSD some tasks in LR really suck. Results may be a different story...
Aperture is not an alternative for Linux and Windows users, of course. Even worse, Apple is going to replace Aperture (and iPhoto) by a new "Photos" app as you will already know. I keep Aperture for now and see...

Currently I process the new photos from my D750 with LR (30 days test version...) and will have a look at AfterShot then.

Cheers and best regards,
d-light

[ferdinand-paris]

I currently have a mixed workflow... Download, cull and caption/keyword with AfterShot. Doing this with LR is already way too painful.

You gave up on IMatch 5, or you're working mainly on your non-Windows box?

IQ wise I should use PictureNinja, but their way of working is so inefficient my teeth hurt.
I might have a look at C1 again next week as they seem to finally have decent regional editing support. I fear they still have totally borked I/O though.

+1 to both of these. The workflow in C1 is ok and the results are generally good, but you have to struggle a lot with how it interacts with the file system.

[afx]

I currently have a mixed workflow... Download, cull and caption/keyword with AfterShot. Doing this with LR is already way too painful.

You gave up on IMatch 5, or you're working mainly on your non-Windows box?

I don't use iMatch much at the moment. But initial captioning was always within AS/Bibble since B5.
At the moment I don't have a need for a strong DB, the projects that required that fell through.

cheers
afx