Thanx to everyone who took the time to post comments. AFX pretty much summed it up, and if you've read through the threads, you know what I mainly use a RAW editor for, a viewer to pick out the best shots to publish. I seldom need to edit RAW files. My in camera settings don't apply much sharpening, because of my style (I like a softer look). My camera allows for many custom functions, which I have assigned to buttons within thumb reach, so mostly, I leave a shoot with useable product.
Thanx to all,
-FD
AfterShot Pro 2 - Bad Canon RAW conversion?
-
FloridaDrafter
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:47 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel
- processor: I7 10th gen 6 core
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: Intel UHD Graphics and Invidia GeForce
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 17" UHD Laptop + DELL 26" USB C HDR
- Corel programs: CorelDraw Suite 21, PSP 23, PI X3, VS 21
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida
-
R Frydryck
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:56 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Re: AfterShot Pro 2 - Bad Canon RAW conversion?
I respectfully disagree. ASP may have more features, but I find the native canon software yealds a better image.bananahead wrote: The Canon software is very good but not as good as ASP (maybe this will change with version 4 in a week or so).