How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video?
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video?
Currently have onboard video but thinking of adding a graphics card. It would be a fairly low level graphics card, under $50. Just not sure how much benefit I can expect. Thanks.
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Depending on what your on-board graphics is, I suspect improvement will be somewhere between very very little to no-existent.
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Seems like even an inexpensive card should make some improvement since system memory won't be used for graphics and what ever minor bump from CUDA.
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Well I had hoped for more feedback but I've decided to pick up an R7 250 and give it a try to see if it helps. Decided to go with AMD as the low end Radeon cards trounce the low end Nvidia cards in the few video editing related benchmarks I could find. I'll post back whether it helped or not.
-
df
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:21 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: GIGABYTE Z690 AERO G DDR4
- processor: 13th Gen Intel Core i7-13700K
- ram: 64gb
- Video Card: RTX 3060 Ti 8gb GDRR6
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 Tb
- Location: Washington State
- Contact:
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Didn't really seem to do much for me on my Nvidia 650 Ti Boost.
Regards, Dan
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast."
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast."
-
brandelh
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 4:40 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: MSI-H87-G41PC Mate
- processor: Intel i5-4670 3.40 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: onboard
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1500 GB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: LG-W2442PA
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
The build in GPU in a i3-2100 is not too fast, but for video and desktop it should be fast enough.
What does Win7 say about the speed ?
The PC here with a i5-2500 has 5 ... so more than good enough for 2D Apps.
What does Win7 say about the speed ?
The PC here with a i5-2500 has 5 ... so more than good enough for 2D Apps.
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Base score is 5.2.
This whole thing has been puzzling me because according to task manager I'm rarely going over about 30% CPU utilization and never using over 4GB of memory even though I have 8GB, but it's acting like I'm running out of memory. Then it occurred to me that VS is acting like a 32bit program, which can't access more than 4GB of RAM.
This whole thing has been puzzling me because according to task manager I'm rarely going over about 30% CPU utilization and never using over 4GB of memory even though I have 8GB, but it's acting like I'm running out of memory. Then it occurred to me that VS is acting like a 32bit program, which can't access more than 4GB of RAM.
-
brandelh
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 4:40 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: MSI-H87-G41PC Mate
- processor: Intel i5-4670 3.40 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: onboard
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1500 GB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: LG-W2442PA
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
My VS16 is a 32 bit Applikation, the new 17 does exists in two versions, but maybe the app don't need more RAM to do the job (for DVD Resolution).
I do have SSDs as harddisks and no speed problems. Now I have installed the 64 bit test version and found FullHD Profiles ... thats what I want.
I do have SSDs as harddisks and no speed problems. Now I have installed the 64 bit test version and found FullHD Profiles ... thats what I want.
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
I don't think VSX7 soft is designed to use GPU. I read somwhere that the 64 bit version uses Intel's on board graphics cores.
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
According to Corel, VS is optimized for Nvidia's CUDA and AMD's equivalent (whatever they call it).
http://www.videostudiopro.com/docs/prod ... son-en.pdf
http://www.videostudiopro.com/docs/prod ... son-en.pdf
- Ken Berry
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22481
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
- processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- ram: 32 GB DDR4
- Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
- Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
- Location: Levin, New Zealand
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
Unfortunately, however, it seems the CUDA it will only work with are now very old versions. It has not been updated to work with current CUDA versions.
Ken Berry
-
wormil
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 8:39 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 67M
- processor: i3-2100
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: Geforce GT610
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: Garner
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Acer S232HL
- Corel programs: VSU X7, CD X7
Re: How much improvement from graphics card vs onboard video
AMD version is passive and supposed to work whether optimized for it or not. Might be part of the reason low end AMD cards are so much faster at rendering video.
