did a quick test with ASP2 (linux) compared to Photivo compared to ASP2+ASP HDR (WIN) compared to Photivo (linux)
Tried to achieve a relative natural look in both ASP (Pseudo-) HDR and Photivo (dynamic compression).
See screenshots - concerning natural look and highlight recovery.
o Metadata (Date ...) is deleted when working with ASP HDR) so I had to copy Metadata from the original Picture to the new one.
o No good integration of ASP HDR with ASP the picture is not saved in the same folder where its opened by default
o BW-Pseudo HDR is saved as bw and not rgb tiff - ASP cannot read this tiff ...
So for now - on problematic files concerning highlights, or for special files its better to open the raw in photivo - save as 16bit tiff and finish in ASP.
Quick Test ASP2-HDR-Photivo
-
hannes_hab
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:49 am
- System_Drive: Z
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUSTeK P8H77-I
- processor: Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5 GHz x 8
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
- sound_card: Radeon HD 7700 7800 Sapphire
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2x250GbSSD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: LG IPS 21:9 UltraWide 34UM95-P 3440x1440
- Corel programs: AfterShotPro 1, 2, (3)
- Location: Austria
Quick Test ASP2-HDR-Photivo
- Attachments
-
- above ASP HDR below photivo - detail
-
- above ASP2 below photivo - detail
-
- above ASP2 below photivo
regards Hannes
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)