I am new to the Ullead VideoStudio 9 and have a couple of questions. What is the best file format to transfer video from my DV HandyCam to my PC. I am running XP and everything I am trying looks blurry and dull.
Also, what is the best format for playback to get the best picture or would I get a better looking picture burning a DVD?
Thanks for your help!!!!!
File Formats
Moderator: Ken Berry
- Ken Berry
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22481
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
- processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- ram: 32 GB DDR4
- Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
- Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
- Location: Levin, New Zealand
Video Studio's playback screen is one of its weakest points. It should only ever be regarded as an assistance in editing to show where you are, how things look generally and what the general effects of your editing are. But it's quality is, IMHO, very poor. Anything you capture will nearly always look bad - very grainy and with little real contrast ("blurry and dull" is also a very good description). That being said, those effects are usually only limited to playing back in the program itself (if you follow all the other recommended procedures closely). Have you, for instance, tried playing back the captured video in another computer-based player such as WinDVD or Power DVD or even the Windows Media Player? How does it look then? Whatever the case, your final burned DVD should look VERY much better than it does when previewed in Video Studio.
All that being said, have you read the Recommended Procedures Announcement at the very top of this Board? That should answer your other questions. But briefly, most people agree that you should capture from your digital video camera in DV/AVI format as this emulates exactly the quality of the video in your camera and does not 'stress' your computer. The downside is that the captured files are large (around 13 GB for an hour of video). Some people capture direct to MPEG-2, though this usually requires a more powerful computer and in the past has been known to create issues with the final product. Captured mpeg files are much smaller than DV ones.
Your final question has in effect already been answered: regardless of the format, previews in Video Studio will never look wonderful. And in any case, even if you capture in DV/AVI (which will give the best quality), it will eventually have to be converted to MPEG-2 as this is the format required for you to burn the final DVD.
Anyway, if you don't believe any of this, try burning your project to a DVD, but use an RW disc so you don't waste a blank if you don't like the final result. But I can virtually guarantee that if you follow the other recommended procedures, the burned DVD will look many times better than when you play the original files back in Video Studio.
All that being said, have you read the Recommended Procedures Announcement at the very top of this Board? That should answer your other questions. But briefly, most people agree that you should capture from your digital video camera in DV/AVI format as this emulates exactly the quality of the video in your camera and does not 'stress' your computer. The downside is that the captured files are large (around 13 GB for an hour of video). Some people capture direct to MPEG-2, though this usually requires a more powerful computer and in the past has been known to create issues with the final product. Captured mpeg files are much smaller than DV ones.
Your final question has in effect already been answered: regardless of the format, previews in Video Studio will never look wonderful. And in any case, even if you capture in DV/AVI (which will give the best quality), it will eventually have to be converted to MPEG-2 as this is the format required for you to burn the final DVD.
Anyway, if you don't believe any of this, try burning your project to a DVD, but use an RW disc so you don't waste a blank if you don't like the final result. But I can virtually guarantee that if you follow the other recommended procedures, the burned DVD will look many times better than when you play the original files back in Video Studio.
Ken Berry
-
dleathers
Another Question
Okay...I am trying to import the video and these are the settings it says to use...
Mpeg Capture Properties:
NTSC drop frame (29.97 fps)
MPEG files
24 Bits, 720 x 480, 29.97 fps
Lower Field First for digital capture {if capturing analog use "Upper Field First"}
(DVD-NTSC), 4:3 (or 16:9 for widescreen)
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 8000 kbps)
Audio data rate: 224 kbps
MPEG audio layer 2, 48 KHz, Stereo
But the frame size will go no higher then 320 x 240
Would using a firewire instead of a USB work better?
Mpeg Capture Properties:
NTSC drop frame (29.97 fps)
MPEG files
24 Bits, 720 x 480, 29.97 fps
Lower Field First for digital capture {if capturing analog use "Upper Field First"}
(DVD-NTSC), 4:3 (or 16:9 for widescreen)
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 8000 kbps)
Audio data rate: 224 kbps
MPEG audio layer 2, 48 KHz, Stereo
But the frame size will go no higher then 320 x 240
Would using a firewire instead of a USB work better?
-
maddrummer3301
- Posts: 2507
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
- Location: US
- Ken Berry
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22481
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
- processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- ram: 32 GB DDR4
- Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
- Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
- Location: Levin, New Zealand
Further to maddrummer's comment, unless your video camera is a very recent and more expensive one, it is likely only to have a USB 1.0 port. This is for transfer of still photos taken with the camera, or for using the camera as a low quality webcam. For high quality transfer at full frame size, you need to use the Firewire port on the camera (often referred to as an i-link). The problem is that just about all cameras need Firewire, but none of them come bundled with the cord. When you buy a cord, you have to be sure to buy one with the small 4-pin plug on one end and the larger 6 pin one on the other end for the computer. And of course you need a Firewire port/card on the computer.
But apart from that, my comments about the quality of the preview screen remain valid!!
But apart from that, my comments about the quality of the preview screen remain valid!!
Ken Berry
- Ken Berry
- Site Admin
- Posts: 22481
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
- processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- ram: 32 GB DDR4
- Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
- Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
- Location: Levin, New Zealand
-
THoff
I haven't seen the 4-pin plugs on add-on cards either, but some PCs with built-in Firewire use them in the front because of the space savings.
I've worked with two different Sony VAIO desktop models (one a couple of years old, one a brand-new Media Center PC) that have the 4-pin plugs in the front of the PC behind a plastic cover.
I've worked with two different Sony VAIO desktop models (one a couple of years old, one a brand-new Media Center PC) that have the 4-pin plugs in the front of the PC behind a plastic cover.
