Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

AfterShot Pro General Questions & Getting Started Forum
afx
Posts: 1675
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Video Card: FirePro 4900
Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
Location: München
Contact:

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by afx »

Neatimage is plastic mush and the PC image fights with sharpening...
Both are not that useful in my eyes.

cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
mikkokan
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:44 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Finland

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by mikkokan »

The image is taken with 14mm 2.8 and the whole image is useful indeed. You are looking compressed jpg and 2% of the image here :?

My point was that line not the quality of the noise or image.
afx
Posts: 1675
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Video Card: FirePro 4900
Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
Location: München
Contact:

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by afx »

What line?
I assume you are talking about tiling artifacts.
Can't see it in the thing you posted.

cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
mikkokan
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:44 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Finland

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by mikkokan »

Image


This image I posted earlier is even better example. Under nose and above flower. Yes this picture looks also blurred but thats not the point.
Image
afx
Posts: 1675
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Video Card: FirePro 4900
Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
Location: München
Contact:

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by afx »

Yeah, on the right side of the door, still do not see it in the face.
cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
mikkokan
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:44 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Finland

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by mikkokan »

What about now when you click the image? Right above the eye.

But nevertheless its very visible on the second image. I have many many of these examples, maybe 10-20% of all images processed with this noise system.
Attachments
asp2noise.jpg
afx
Posts: 1675
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Video Card: FirePro 4900
Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
Location: München
Contact:

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by afx »

Yup, got it now.

cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
GoremanX
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 8:16 am
operating_system: Linux
System_Drive: N/A
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte AMD 890G
processor: Phenom X6
ram: 8GB
Video Card: AMD HD5750
sound_card: Realtek
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: BenQ Something Something
Contact:

Re: Athentech noise reduction introduces artefacts

Post by GoremanX »

So what happens if I open one of my thousands of pictures that were previously processed in Bibble 5 or ASP 1 and used NN for noise removal? Does my picture end up looking different yet again between software revisions? This has already happened multiple times when color balance changes were made for my cameras between software revisions, thereby rendering all my previously-processed images fugly and useless without more work. Countless hours of work, rendered meaningless.

Worst product for professional photographers ever made... any professional photographer who uses ASP for his work is just begging for an epic failure down the road.
THE place to discuss photography
Friendly Photo Zone
Post Reply