Version 1.2.0.7 is out
-
jknights
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:10 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Apple
- processor: Intel 3.08GHz Dual processor Quad Core
- ram: 24GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon X1600
- sound_card: Intel HDA
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Apple Display
- Location: Oliva, Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
This is one of the reasons why in the past we did the pre-release beta testing before the final code was released.
Corel seem to either do automated in-house testing or blind in-house testing which is not good as you only test to find what you expect to happen.
I think there must be a second release coming as I dont think all the 29 cameras slated for support are actually in that release drop.
Corel seem to either do automated in-house testing or blind in-house testing which is not good as you only test to find what you expect to happen.
I think there must be a second release coming as I dont think all the 29 cameras slated for support are actually in that release drop.
Still learning after all these years!
-
TexJoachim
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 1:22 pm
- System_Drive: Z
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
That link worked, finally.Moldmaker wrote: Hmm ... worked for me. I've been using this link:
http://www.corel.com/akdlm/6763/downloa ... o_i386.rpm
Size of the file: 73950745 Byte
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Joachim
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
I also think so, or at least it launches quite faster.malepo wrote:I second that impressionMoldmaker wrote:Hey, that's my impression too, but I thought I might be imagining it ...dsigman wrote:I have the impression that it runs faster than the previous version,
Mm.
-
jknights
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:10 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Apple
- processor: Intel 3.08GHz Dual processor Quad Core
- ram: 24GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon X1600
- sound_card: Intel HDA
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Apple Display
- Location: Oliva, Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
It does and I am very pleased.afx wrote:The update servers have 1.2.0.7 available:
http://www.corel.com/corel/pages/index. ... id=4300004
Looks like NN works again (at least for NN license holders).
cheers
afx
Still learning after all these years!
-
peteln
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:42 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Magic-pro
- processor: AM64x2
- ram: 3GB
- Video Card: Nvidia GTX275
- sound_card: on board
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
-
Moldmaker
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:16 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock X58
- processor: Intel i7 950 3.07 GHz
- ram: 6GB
- Video Card: NVidia GTX 580
- sound_card: Onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung 2233 RZ
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
Hey, you are right. I can even see that when I open the NEF directly. Have a look at the dimensions. The D600 produces pictures of 6016x4016, but ASP says 6064x4012. This is not correct. So we have 48 pixel too many in the width and 4 pixel loss in the height.peteln wrote:Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
On the other hand, when you open the JPG (coming directly from the camera) instead of the NEF, the dimensions are correct.
This can't be good. Hope they will fix this soon.
Mm.
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
welcome to one of the oldest, most annoying and whatever bugs of aftershot.peteln wrote:Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
if you use CA correction and do not crop a few pixels from the edge, you will get those garbage pixels.
it has nothing to do with the dimensions that aftershot uses, it is a bad algorithm doing the CA-corr. please report it to the monkey, maybe someday corel will finally listen and use one of their employees, let him spend an afternoon on this project and make the life of thousands of users of their software better. PLEASE!!!!!
Bibble since 2004. Aftershot until 2020. From then on darktable.
-
Moldmaker
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 5:16 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock X58
- processor: Intel i7 950 3.07 GHz
- ram: 6GB
- Video Card: NVidia GTX 580
- sound_card: Onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung 2233 RZ
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
I looked into this and found the following:grubernd wrote:welcome to one of the oldest, most annoying and whatever bugs of aftershot.peteln wrote:Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
if you use CA correction and do not crop a few pixels from the edge, you will get those garbage pixels.
it has nothing to do with the dimensions that aftershot uses, it is a bad algorithm doing the CA-corr.
- I did not use CA correction.
- If I open NEF files, all of them have the wrong dimension (6064x4012), but not all of them have garbage pixels on the right side. (This confuses me the most and that's the reason why I did not see it right away.)
- If I open JPG files, everything is all right (dimension 4016x6016 and no garbage pixels).
Mm.
-
peteln
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:42 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Magic-pro
- processor: AM64x2
- ram: 3GB
- Video Card: Nvidia GTX275
- sound_card: on board
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
Same here, I got garbage pixels with all D600 (but not D3 or D200 or D1x) raws, with or without CA correction.
It's weird, because before v1.2.0.7 was out, I opened D600 raws with ASP by editing the EXIF to fool the program that these files were from D800, and got exactly the same garbage pixels.
It's weird, because before v1.2.0.7 was out, I opened D600 raws with ASP by editing the EXIF to fool the program that these files were from D800, and got exactly the same garbage pixels.
-
jknights
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:10 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Apple
- processor: Intel 3.08GHz Dual processor Quad Core
- ram: 24GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon X1600
- sound_card: Intel HDA
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Apple Display
- Location: Oliva, Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
I just got a D600 and loaded some images today into ASP.peteln wrote:Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
Same problem shows as a red/magenta line on right side of image for RAW file.
Last edited by jknights on Wed Sep 18, 2013 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Still learning after all these years!
-
jknights
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:10 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Apple
- processor: Intel 3.08GHz Dual processor Quad Core
- ram: 24GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon X1600
- sound_card: Intel HDA
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Apple Display
- Location: Oliva, Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
+1Moldmaker wrote:I looked into this and found the following:grubernd wrote:welcome to one of the oldest, most annoying and whatever bugs of aftershot.peteln wrote:Thanks for the D600 support...but is it only me who get a few lines of garbage pixels at the right border of the converted JPEGs?
if you use CA correction and do not crop a few pixels from the edge, you will get those garbage pixels.
it has nothing to do with the dimensions that aftershot uses, it is a bad algorithm doing the CA-corr.
- I did not use CA correction.
- If I open NEF files, all of them have the wrong dimension (6064x4012), but not all of them have garbage pixels on the right side. (This confuses me the most and that's the reason why I did not see it right away.)
- If I open JPG files, everything is all right (dimension 4016x6016 and no garbage pixels).
Mm.
I do not have CA enabled but I still get the magenta pixels on the right side of my image.
Still learning after all these years!
-
jknights
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:10 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Apple
- processor: Intel 3.08GHz Dual processor Quad Core
- ram: 24GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon X1600
- sound_card: Intel HDA
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Apple Display
- Location: Oliva, Valencia, Spain
- Contact:
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
I also do not have CA enabled but I still get the garbage red line on the right edge of the image.
Still learning after all these years!
Re: Version 1.2.0.7 is out
I also have a few pixels wide red line in the upper border of picture. Pentax K30 DNG.
