Moderator: Kathy_9
Yes, if you want the effect of softness (as in your image) you can certainly apply further editing to get that effect.see3 wrote: So what you're saying is that after further filter-editing, i.e. lightening, softening, you basically end up with what my image looks like?
I was not/am not satisfied with my image but I couldn't get better definition without seeing something similar to what your image looks like; less the polka dots.photodrawken wrote:Yes, if you want the effect of softness (as in your image) you can certainly apply further editing to get that effect.see3 wrote: So what you're saying is that after further filter-editing, i.e. lightening, softening, you basically end up with what my image looks like?
The same is true for removing anything else -- standard editing procedures can be applied locally or globally as desired.
I understand your point. Just don't know why you think "Not too shabby".photodrawken wrote:Well, you pays your money and you makes your choice.
Like I keep saying, standard photo editing techniques apply for any adjustments you want:
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Because I'm very pleased with the result.see3 wrote: I understand your point. Just don't know why you think "Not too shabby".
No wars. Skipped the sleeve to show a contrast with the excellence of my results.see3 wrote:I thought this was Filter-Wars. You skipped the white sleeve. lol
At least somebody is satisfied ..photodrawken wrote:Because I'm very pleased with the result.see3 wrote: I understand your point. Just don't know why you think "Not too shabby".No wars. Skipped the sleeve to show a contrast with the excellence of my results.see3 wrote:I thought this was Filter-Wars. You skipped the white sleeve. lol
You can be too. Just follow the excellent techniques I described!see3 wrote: At least somebody is satisfied ..
Humble too?photodrawken wrote:You can be too. Just follow the excellent techniques I described!see3 wrote: At least somebody is satisfied ..