ormdig wrote:ASP is still unmatched in speed, both in editing changes and batch conversion.
Speed is no good to anyone without image quality, where ASP lags
drastically behind very other commercial converter and most open source converters too.
As Andy Salay - a one time big fan of Bibble/ASP, now completelly disillusioned with it -
says (I've emphasised the section relevant to speed):
Almost no IQ bugs were solved so far. Demosaicing quality is stagnating at best, despite all the competition is running fast. Capture one is miraclous on details level, HR is fantastic, too.
Excellent results are almost instant, just a few sliders away.
How terribly different against all the old Bibble/ASP fiddling with curves, Bez plugin, different denoise, very careful sharpening with more different plugins... And all that deliver just mediocre results on pixel level against latest capture one.
The point being that program speed is utterly worthless if it takes so long to get to a point where you're -
just about - happy (in the loosest sense of the word) to convert the file that the speed "advantage" is entirely wiped out: and when the results don't warrant the effort anyway, you eventually just stop using the software.
Oh, and for the record, on my machine ASP is
significantly slower to convert Canon 7D files to 16 bit tiff, than Lightroom 4, Capture One, DxO Optics or Photo Ninja...