PSPX5.
I don't know if this has been reported (this forum has a terrible search facility...), but I've just noticed that the brush size is 1px per side less than is set:
That sure looks like a 4x4 pixel brush....
Inaccurate "Precise Cursor" positioning
Moderator: Kathy_9
-
photodrawken
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:40 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- ram: 16Gb
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 324Gb
- Location: USA
Inaccurate "Precise Cursor" positioning
Last edited by photodrawken on Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
- hartpaul
- Advisor
- Posts: 2893
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUSTeK P7P55D STRIX B240F GAMING
- processor: IntelCore i7 7700 3.60 Ghz
- ram: 8 Gb
- Video Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
- sound_card: Nvidia High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1000 Gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: AOC
- Corel programs: PSP8,X2 to X9,2018,2019,2020
- Location: Australia
Re: Inaccurate brush size
Up beside the Size to the left if you choose the square shape and set hardness to 100 you will see your 5 x 5 pixel brush. the difference is becaus you have chosen the round shape and it is trying to redduce corner pixel density to simulate roundness .
Test both with 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 pixel brushes to see the difference.
Test both with 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5 pixel brushes to see the difference.
Systems available Win7, Win 8.1,Win 10 Version 1607 Build 14393.2007 & version 20H2 Build 19042.867
-
photodrawken
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:40 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- ram: 16Gb
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 324Gb
- Location: USA
Re: Inaccurate brush size
I care not a whit about "corner pixel density", nor its reduction. When I use a hardness setting of 100% and set a 5 (or 4, or 6) pixel "size" for a round brush, I expect the brush's diameter to be 5 (or 4, or 6) pixels.hartpaul wrote:the difference is becaus you have chosen the round shape and it is trying to redduce corner pixel density to simulate roundness
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
-
photodrawken
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 8:40 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- ram: 16Gb
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 324Gb
- Location: USA
Re: Inaccurate brush size
Aha! I was mistaken when looking at the brush and estimating its dimensions. Here's the brush when the grid is set to 1px:
Sure looks like a 5px brush, now.... 
What got me started on this is that the "precise cursor" crosshairs are not centered in the brush shape: So, the title of this discussion should really be "Inaccurate positioning of precise cursor".
What got me started on this is that the "precise cursor" crosshairs are not centered in the brush shape: So, the title of this discussion should really be "Inaccurate positioning of precise cursor".
Ken
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
Yes, I think it can be eeeeeasily done...
Just take everything out on Highway 61.
