X4 Performance...SD upscale to AVCHD

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
wstagner
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:29 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte Ga-p43-es3g
processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 2.66 GHz
ram: 8gb
Video Card: ATI Radion HD4300 4500 series
sound_card: ATI High Definition Realtek ALC888 codec
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Asus VH242H 24" 1920x1024 screen.
Location: Illinois, USA.
Contact:

X4 Performance...SD upscale to AVCHD

Post by wstagner »

90 mins to render 6 mp4 files to an AVCHD file. I don't see much quality difference for the 3x longer rendering time and file size compared to an mpg file.
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Re: X4 Performance...SD upscale to AVCHD

Post by Ken Berry »

Well, for once I sort of agree. I have no idea which videos you used in your experiment with 6 clips, much less how long they were in total. But you say that it took 3x as long to render them to an AVCHD file as compared to an SD mpg file. So I took the 3 mp4 files you sent me and simply inserted them twice. With transitions, this totalled 3:32 mins. I rendered them to an AVCHD HD file 1920 x 1080i and it took 5:19 minutes. So under 2x realtime. I also rendered it to an NTSC DVD-compatible mpeg-2 using 8000 kbps bitrate. That took 1:20 minutes. So in fact in my case the conversion to AVCHD took longer than it did for you -- i.e. around 4x.

I would have to agree, though, that the end quality of the two final videos was not particularly better, though I thought the AVCHD had slightly better contrast and less flicker. Mind you, this did not particularly surprise me either since we were going from mp4 SD using H.264 Baseline to AVCHD using the H.264 codec, albeit with a much larger frame size...
Ken Berry
wstagner
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:29 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte Ga-p43-es3g
processor: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 2.66 GHz
ram: 8gb
Video Card: ATI Radion HD4300 4500 series
sound_card: ATI High Definition Realtek ALC888 codec
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Asus VH242H 24" 1920x1024 screen.
Location: Illinois, USA.
Contact:

Re: X4 Performance...SD upscale to AVCHD

Post by wstagner »

Ken, I used those same 3 files that you used plus 3 others from the same set so your test was right on the money.

Nothing I've been able to do in X4 takes less time than previous versions.

CyberDirector 9 touts being 64 bit, using multicore CPU features, etc but the TBYB version was so crippled I wasn't able to test anything other than installation/uninstallation.
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Re: X4 Performance...SD upscale to AVCHD

Post by Ken Berry »

My conversion to AVCHD definitely took less time than in previous versions, where it could be around 4x on this same computer. And the conversion to SD mpeg-2 -- less than half real time -- was also roughly half what it took with previous versions (just a tad less than real time). I have noticed also the conversion speed increases in the burning module in your other major thread about burning a DVD. So for me, at least, that is a mjor improvement in X4...
Ken Berry
Post Reply