Capture VS11 vs. X3

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
sgraham
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:29 pm

Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by sgraham »

New 8gig Dell XPS8100 running VX3 on Windows 7. The old station is Dell high end Precision 4Gig XP Pro VS11. My camera is a Canon XL H1. Both systems recognize the camera and I captured three hours of film I shot last Saturday on the XP Pro machine. I am doing the capture now on the new Windows 7 VX3 machine. I'm going to take a look and see if there is any difference between the size of the mpg2 downconverted capture files and also try and evalutae if there are any quality differences. Since I am getting old my eye is not always so sharp and the moniters are different on the two workstations. Does anyone know if there is a driver difference or any sort of factors that would influence and produce differences in the quality of the capture between the workstation and software setups described above?
DVDDoug
Moderator
Posts: 2714
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 12:50 am
Location: Silicon Valley

Re: Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by DVDDoug »

I'm going to take a look and see if there is any difference between the size of the mpg2 downconverted capture files and also try and evaluate if there are any quality differences.
Are you sure it's getting "downconverted"? Does it record to MPEG-2 internally?

Typically with a digital camera, it's not really "video capture", but just a data-transfer (and sometimes data "re-packaging" to a computer file-format with the proper file header, & file name, etc.).
[size=92][i]Head over heels,
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
sgraham
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by sgraham »

the output is an MPG2 UFF. The file is exactly the same size on both workstations and, at least to my eye, looks exactly alike. No dropped frames as far as I can tell on either but I have found that is more a function of the camera that is doing the output than the capture software.
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Re: Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by Ron P. »

Canon's XL HI records HDV using the MPEG-2 codec to DV tape. However unless you set your camcorder to record standard definition DV, it records 1080i, High-Definition. If you used the firewire port to transfer the video from the camcorder to your PC, it is not capturing, but just transferring. When you transferred. did you set the capture properties to that of a standard definition video?
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
sgraham
Posts: 127
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by sgraham »

I shoot in 30p High Def setting and it is automatic downconvert to 1440 x 1080 (1440 is canon anomaly) so a 60 min record dumps out to about 11gig. I did not see any Capture properties on the VS side. I do output from the camera via firewire.
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Re: Capture VS11 vs. X3

Post by Ken Berry »

Down-conversion is from high def to standard def. Your camera is HDV and all HDV is 1440x1080 with a pixel aspect of .133, unless you're acquiring with a JVC, which is 1280 x 720, square pixel. This has nothing to do with the down-conversion or a Canon quirk, it's what all HDV cameras send. The .133 pixel is then stretched to become 1920 on display. In other words, a 1440 anamorphic image yields a 1920 display.
Ken Berry
Post Reply