Hi Terry
http://forum.corel.com/EN/viewtopic.php ... &hilit=map
Quote Ron:-
First.. Thank you Trevor for providing these, as it pushed me to pursue this problem in considerable depth to find a possible solution.
With the examples provided by Trevor, I was able to observe the horrible quality with VS X2 in comparison to VS8. I was not willing to settle for it is just a result of the program. Since I have numerous versions installed on my desktop, versions 8 through X2 Pro, and MSP8, I started a lengthy troubleshooting process. Instead of bore everyone with all the details, I'll just post a short summary.
In VS10 + I noticed that the quality had slipped, when in VS8 and VS9 the quality was good. So digging deeper in VS10+ I finally found the culprit to this, it is the anti-flickering filter. When I unchecked this option in VS10+ the quality was identical to that of VS8. So the next step is to check this in VS X2. When
I unchecked the apply anti-flickering filter, the quality was the same compared to VS8...
So for some reason this nice little filter has an adverse affect on images like maps. It tends to blur the text. I'll also add that since this was checked on PCs, I used Frame-based and unchecked render non-square pixels. PCs do not use interlaced video (LFF or UFF), and uses square pixels.