Photos look terrible

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
marce
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:45 pm
operating_system: Vista Home Basic
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: dont know
processor: pentium dual 2.40 ghz
ram: 4.gb
Video Card: dont know
sound_card: dont know
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 450
Location: Alberta, Canada

Photos look terrible

Post by marce »

I added some photos to my timeline production, anywhere from 200-600 kb. When I give the production a run
through the photos look terrible, kind of cruched up it seems. What do i do to resolve this? Should I make my
photos a smaller KB.
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Ron P. »

Photo size as in KB, means nothing in video. What is the resolution sizes, ie; pixel sizes of your photos? What is the project settings? If you're going to produce a slideshow, then using the Frame Based field order will be best, also if you're using pan/zoom, uncheck preform non-square pixel rendering.
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
Accolades
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:38 am
operating_system: Windows 7 Ultimate
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4
processor: QuadCore Intel Core i7 920 2833 MHz 21 x 135
ram: 12 GB DDR3
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 295
sound_card: On Board 5.1 Surround - Realtek ALC888 - 1200
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB +
Location: Brisbane, Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Accolades »

marce wrote:I added some photos to my timeline production, anywhere from 200-600 kb. When I give the production a run
through the photos look terrible, kind of cruched up it seems. What do i do to resolve this? Should I make my
photos a smaller KB.
What version of VS are you using? :?:

Did you just import a lot of photos onto the timeline? :?:

Sounds like you have to adjust the ZOOM in the timeline to view to the size required. :idea:

Maybe you need to adjust the options for how long each photo shows on the slideshow? :idea:

Just trying to GUESS as to what you mean.... :?

More info required.... :roll: :)
My You Tube Channel:
My Vimeo Channel:
SONY MOVIE STUDIO PLATINUM HD 10, Corel Video Studio X3, Corel Draw Graphics Suite X4 (Draw, Paint), Adobe Photo Shop CS4, Adobe Bridge CS4, DivX 8, Irfranview, FRAPS, Deamon Tools, VLC, MyDefrag, Nero, AVG, Winamp, Autopano, VMware...
marce
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:45 pm
operating_system: Vista Home Basic
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: dont know
processor: pentium dual 2.40 ghz
ram: 4.gb
Video Card: dont know
sound_card: dont know
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 450
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by marce »

if i "fit" them to screen they dont' seem so bad. What are a good pixel size for photos. I'm combining mostly video footage with a few photos.

using Pro X3.
Accolades
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:38 am
operating_system: Windows 7 Ultimate
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4
processor: QuadCore Intel Core i7 920 2833 MHz 21 x 135
ram: 12 GB DDR3
Video Card: Nvidia GeForce GTX 295
sound_card: On Board 5.1 Surround - Realtek ALC888 - 1200
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB +
Location: Brisbane, Queensland Australia
Contact:

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Accolades »

marce wrote:if i "fit" them to screen they dont' seem so bad. What are a good pixel size for photos. I'm combining mostly video footage with a few photos.

using Pro X3.
MORE INFO!!

Video format/properties?

Workflow process?

Fit them the what screen?

Pixel size for photos was discussed above.
My You Tube Channel:
My Vimeo Channel:
SONY MOVIE STUDIO PLATINUM HD 10, Corel Video Studio X3, Corel Draw Graphics Suite X4 (Draw, Paint), Adobe Photo Shop CS4, Adobe Bridge CS4, DivX 8, Irfranview, FRAPS, Deamon Tools, VLC, MyDefrag, Nero, AVG, Winamp, Autopano, VMware...
BrianCee

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by BrianCee »

I'm sure a number of people will offer you all sorts of "prefered" sizes marce - but for me personnally I use any size which is the correct format (ie 4:3 or 16:9) as long as it is at least as big or bigger than your standard video frame size - now here is a reason why we ask people to completely fill in their profile - where in this great wide world do you live (just the country will do we don't need to know your street address) - because I do not know whether you use PAL or NTSC without that information and so have to include details for both - which can confuse.

If you are in a PAL country then the minimum size I would use is 720 x 576 pixels - in an NTSC country use 720 x 480.

but having said that I always make my photos to MY standard according to the screen format so for a 4:3 project I would use 800 x 600 and for a 16:9 I would use 1067 x 600 - - works for me

sorry to bang on a bit but the more information you put in your profile the more we can help with solutions to your problems
Trevor Andrew

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi

Yep Brian is correct in using the video aspect for your image ratios, the minimum sizes being the video size, for Pal 768 x 576 will produce a 4:3 image, 1024 x 576 being widescreen
4:3 or 16:9, just use a calculator to workout the sizes.
These would of course fill the video frame.

If you intend to use Pan & Zoom then double your sizes as a minimum, this tents to keep a better quality during zooming

If you intend to use the overlay tracks for a Picture in Picture effect then the aspect ratio may not be as important.

But you are not giving us any info on your video types, right click a video clip in the timeline and select properties. What are they?
skier-hughes
Microsoft MVP
Posts: 2659
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: gigabyte
processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
ram: 4GB
Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
sound_card: onboard
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
Location: UK

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by skier-hughes »

and of course you could be compiling a video in any of the multitude of HD sizes, so you might need a 1920x1080 image, same size as 16:9, but a smaller image blown up to that size will look poor.
BrianCee

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by BrianCee »

Maybe one day I'll invest in an HD camcorder then I can learn all about all those different frame sizes.
Trevor Andrew

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi Brian

Just do Create Video File -and look at the various template settings, that way it will save you a little money.
But as you say, keep to the aspect ratio.
Clevo
Advisor
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 2:39 am
operating_system: Vista Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Asus PK5
processor: Intel Quad CPU Q6600 2.40GHz
ram: 4GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
sound_card: Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 850GB
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by Clevo »

The OP said the pictures are "scrunched up"...which to me sounds like the OP is having aspect ratio issues.

Right click on the photo still in the preview window...experiment with selecting one of the options. You can see immediately which one suits you the most, Usually "keep original size" (or something like that) works a treat
marce
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:45 pm
operating_system: Vista Home Basic
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: dont know
processor: pentium dual 2.40 ghz
ram: 4.gb
Video Card: dont know
sound_card: dont know
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 450
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: Photos look terrible

Post by marce »

okay, thanks for the help. I should be able to move on from your comments.

I'm based out of Alberta, Canada, I added that to my profile.
Post Reply