I'm using VS12 and would like to make a slideshow which would include transitions and panning, no audio.
In most cases I will want to show the entire image, 35mm format but some will be cropped to fit the proportions of a wide screen TV or have been shot in a panoramic format. Having the black boarders on the non-cropped images is not an issue.
I will be starting with images at a resolution in most cases of 4256 x 2832 at 300 ppi.
So.... In Photoshop I plan to re-size the images down to 72 ppi, re-profile the images to Adobe sRGB (from Adobe 1998) and save them as a .tif
In VS12 I have the following set as my project preferences.
NTSC drop frame (29.97 fps)
MPEG files
24 bits, 720 x 480, 29.97 fps
Frame-based
(MPEG-2), 16:9
The only use of this slideshow is to run continuously on a DVD in my galleries storefront window. Quality of the images is most important.
Any suggestions/changes, etc...? The sample I did seems very nice but I'm open to and appreciate suggestions or corrections in my settings. Anything I should be aware of in the DVD burning process?
Thanks! David
West Light Images
All photo slideshow, best workflow/image sizing
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
westlight
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:20 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 970 Extreme3
- processor: AMD FX-6100 Six Core Processor 4.20 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 8000 gb
- Location: Park City, UT
- Contact:
All photo slideshow, best workflow/image sizing
westlight
www.westlight.net
www.westlight.net
-
sjj1805
- Posts: 14383
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Equium P200-178
- processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
- ram: 2 GB
- Video Card: Intel 945 Express
- sound_card: Intel GMA 950
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
- Location: Birmingham UK
Dependant upon the amount of time and effort you have available,
Firstly I would employ a Ken Burns Effect to your images>
Link 1
Link 2
Link 3
If you find it necessary to resize your images (I mostly use the images straight off the SD card) then the suggested sizes are here:
What dimensions etc should I use for still images in Videos?
Firstly I would employ a Ken Burns Effect to your images>
Link 1
Link 2
Link 3
If you find it necessary to resize your images (I mostly use the images straight off the SD card) then the suggested sizes are here:
What dimensions etc should I use for still images in Videos?
- Ron P.
- Advisor
- Posts: 12002
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
- processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
- sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
- Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
- Location: Kansas, USA
Welcome back David..
You have the most impressive work I've seen!!!
Is your widescreen TV an HD TV? If so have you thought about producing a Hi-Def video to display? You could try using the following:
MPEG files
24 bits, 1920 x 1080, 29.97 fps
Frame Based
(MPEG-2), 16:9
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 10653 kbps)
In order to set that up, in the Share>Create Video File step, you need to first choose Custom. Then file type MPEG. Next press Options, and in the dialog that opens go first to the Compression tab and change it from NTSC DVD to MPEG-2. Next go to the General tab, and change the frame size to 1920 x 1080. Data Track -Video only, Frame Type-Frame Based.
I think a Hi-Def video would do more justice to your work..
You have the most impressive work I've seen!!!
Is your widescreen TV an HD TV? If so have you thought about producing a Hi-Def video to display? You could try using the following:
MPEG files
24 bits, 1920 x 1080, 29.97 fps
Frame Based
(MPEG-2), 16:9
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 10653 kbps)
In order to set that up, in the Share>Create Video File step, you need to first choose Custom. Then file type MPEG. Next press Options, and in the dialog that opens go first to the Compression tab and change it from NTSC DVD to MPEG-2. Next go to the General tab, and change the frame size to 1920 x 1080. Data Track -Video only, Frame Type-Frame Based.
I think a Hi-Def video would do more justice to your work..
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
-
westlight
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:20 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 970 Extreme3
- processor: AMD FX-6100 Six Core Processor 4.20 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 8000 gb
- Location: Park City, UT
- Contact:
Hi guys! As always thank you for your help...and for the compliments on my photography!
Sorry I could not find the links you posted when I did some searching before I posted this question. That is the info I was after and knew had been covered previously.
When I did the first slideshow the images seemed very pixelated, but I had also included some HD video making things a bit more complicated. I had left the images at 300ppi also which from one post I read was perhaps not the best idea. That's why I re-sized them to 72 ppi.
One post suggested 96 ppi but I did not understand the reasoning behind that suggestion. I did use the frame based setting this time on the most recent test instead of the Upper Field First, which is what my HD video required.
I have been using the "Ken Burns" effect which brings up a question. Is it possible to change the ratios of the viewable image while panning and or zooming? I was thinking of perhaps starting with a narrow horizontal slice of a shot then as I zoom out having it become full frame.
I have to get a new TV just for the galleries front window so HD will be on the shopping list.
Take care! David
Sorry I could not find the links you posted when I did some searching before I posted this question. That is the info I was after and knew had been covered previously.
When I did the first slideshow the images seemed very pixelated, but I had also included some HD video making things a bit more complicated. I had left the images at 300ppi also which from one post I read was perhaps not the best idea. That's why I re-sized them to 72 ppi.
One post suggested 96 ppi but I did not understand the reasoning behind that suggestion. I did use the frame based setting this time on the most recent test instead of the Upper Field First, which is what my HD video required.
I have been using the "Ken Burns" effect which brings up a question. Is it possible to change the ratios of the viewable image while panning and or zooming? I was thinking of perhaps starting with a narrow horizontal slice of a shot then as I zoom out having it become full frame.
I have to get a new TV just for the galleries front window so HD will be on the shopping list.
Take care! David
westlight
www.westlight.net
www.westlight.net
- Ron P.
- Advisor
- Posts: 12002
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
- processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
- ram: 16GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
- sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
- Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
- Location: Kansas, USA
It's not possible to change the ratio in the pan/zoom. However you can probably achieve the same effect by using the crop filter and pan/zoom. Your image will need to be in an overlay track, so you can Chroma-key out the black border/mask applied by the crop filter.
I played around with this using the crop filter size of 100% Height and 33% width on the first key-frame. The last key frame was 100% for both. Then I used a left to right pan.
I played around with this using the crop filter size of 100% Height and 33% width on the first key-frame. The last key frame was 100% for both. Then I used a left to right pan.
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
-
westlight
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:20 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 970 Extreme3
- processor: AMD FX-6100 Six Core Processor 4.20 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 8000 gb
- Location: Park City, UT
- Contact:
Thanks erdna. I didn't know if VideoStudio re-sampled, the larger files, 30-100 megs, down and if so would Photoshop would do a better job which was why I wondered about the .ppi. As mentioned in the original post I had read a few different suggestions/opinions on this forum.
Guess I'll find out!
Guess I'll find out!
westlight
www.westlight.net
www.westlight.net
-
westlight
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:20 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock 970 Extreme3
- processor: AMD FX-6100 Six Core Processor 4.20 Ghz
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 6700 Series
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 8000 gb
- Location: Park City, UT
- Contact:
I'm getting some blotchy images, especially during panning "Ken Burns" effect and during cross-fade transitions. Also, images with a lot of detail, like in a forest with bright fall foliage, seem very "pixelated". Here's a sample image, NOT at the size used for the slideshow. http://westlightimages.com/gallery/new_images.htm#15
So, I've purchased a new 40" HDTV to place in the window of my gallery to display the HD slideshow of the selected still images as described previously. The slideshow is being run off a flash drive via a HDMI cable. I've tried a few different settings for this, including the one Ron suggested.
MPEG files
24 bits, 1920 x 1080, 29.97 fps
Frame Based
(MPEG-2), 16:9
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 10653 kbps)
I've tried using images at 72ppi and 300ppi, even though I've read differing opinions on if this matters, and all are .tif's saved in a srgb color profile. The colors are fine it's more the issue with the panning and transitions that I'm questioning.
Is this just the nature of the beast regarding panning/zooming and transitions?
So, I've purchased a new 40" HDTV to place in the window of my gallery to display the HD slideshow of the selected still images as described previously. The slideshow is being run off a flash drive via a HDMI cable. I've tried a few different settings for this, including the one Ron suggested.
MPEG files
24 bits, 1920 x 1080, 29.97 fps
Frame Based
(MPEG-2), 16:9
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 10653 kbps)
I've tried using images at 72ppi and 300ppi, even though I've read differing opinions on if this matters, and all are .tif's saved in a srgb color profile. The colors are fine it's more the issue with the panning and transitions that I'm questioning.
Is this just the nature of the beast regarding panning/zooming and transitions?
westlight
www.westlight.net
www.westlight.net
