PAL image size

Moderator: Ken Berry

mitchell65
Posts: 1200
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:50 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Dell Inc. 04GJJT A00
processor: 2.80 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad Core
ram: 4Gb
Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
sound_card: Realtek High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 560Gb Sata
Location: Cornwall UK

Post by mitchell65 »

erdna wrote: My experience is that it doesn't make any difference in resolution when e.g. zooming is applied.
It does on my HD TV 8)
John Mitchell
We all make mistakes, that's why pencils have erasers on the end!
erdna
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
processor: I7 4770
ram: 16GB DDR3
Video Card: Intel HD4600
sound_card: Intel display audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
Location: Belgium

Post by erdna »

I retested on a fullHD TV, and indeed there is a difference. Edges are somewhat sharper, but there is a lot of aliasing, which make e.g. that a text on a banner in the image becomes almost unreadable when VS has to resize the large image. Apparently the oversized image is just being resampled without any Nyquist refiltering. I compaired a 3648x2736 image (straight on the timeline) with its resized (768x560) version on the same timeline. Made a 720x560 MPEG2 video file and played the file on my fullHD monitor through my PowerDVD8 SW player.
Ken Veal
Posts: 1679
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: msi mpg z390 gaming edge ac lga 1151 ddr4
processor: 360 gigahertz Intel Core i9 900K
ram: 32 GB
Video Card: EVGA GeForceGTX 760 2GB GDDR5 PCI E 3 0
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1250GB SSD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung U28E90 28” UHD 4k
Corel programs: PaintSPro2021Ult.PhotoMirage.VS.2020 Ult
Location: London,England

Image Size

Post by Ken Veal »

jpeg ,RGB True colour, 24bit,Width 3071 Height 1838px,Res 28 px/cm,
size 16,537kb
Trevor Andrew

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi Erdna
erdna wrote: I compaired a 3648x2736 image (straight on the timeline) with its resized (768x560) version on the same timeline. .
With these images in the timeline, use pan and zoom on each, compare the difference in the timeline.
erdna
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
processor: I7 4770
ram: 16GB DDR3
Video Card: Intel HD4600
sound_card: Intel display audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
Location: Belgium

Post by erdna »

With pan and zoom it's even worse. an extra strong flicker on the characters becomes visible. Is there a way to post my .jpeg files (the original pic and the presized) so that other people can do a test?
erdna
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
processor: I7 4770
ram: 16GB DDR3
Video Card: Intel HD4600
sound_card: Intel display audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
Location: Belgium

Post by erdna »

I uploaded the 2 files in http://users.telenet.be/bettydemey/
erdna
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
processor: I7 4770
ram: 16GB DDR3
Video Card: Intel HD4600
sound_card: Intel display audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
Location: Belgium

Post by erdna »

I now added screenshots of the result ( not yet pan/zoomed) in an mpeg2 file played back with PDVD8.
erdna
Posts: 659
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
processor: I7 4770
ram: 16GB DDR3
Video Card: Intel HD4600
sound_card: Intel display audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
Location: Belgium

Post by erdna »

Finally I found out that if you don't apply pan/scan on an oversized image it is being rendered without the right filtering, thereby causing aliasing. If pan/scan is being applied and the file rendered, the end result is indeed significantly better. (resolution). I now also uploaded the "problem" .mpg file where the pre-sized, and the oversized image clips were rendered without pan/scan applied. My conclusion is thus, to never use oversized image clips if there is no P/S involved.
Trevor Andrew

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi erdna

Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for the info and sample clips.
Interesting result.
In the past I have always used sizes to match the video frame, only recently increasing (double size) for my slide shows.
I don¡¦t use Pan & Zoom that much so will be taking a good look at the next slide show.

By the way I noticed you used interlaced video, have you try Frame Based for your slide shows.
I realise with video included we would use interlaced. Just a thought.
Post Reply