It does on my HD TVerdna wrote: My experience is that it doesn't make any difference in resolution when e.g. zooming is applied.
PAL image size
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
mitchell65
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:50 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Dell Inc. 04GJJT A00
- processor: 2.80 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad Core
- ram: 4Gb
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
- sound_card: Realtek High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 560Gb Sata
- Location: Cornwall UK
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
I retested on a fullHD TV, and indeed there is a difference. Edges are somewhat sharper, but there is a lot of aliasing, which make e.g. that a text on a banner in the image becomes almost unreadable when VS has to resize the large image. Apparently the oversized image is just being resampled without any Nyquist refiltering. I compaired a 3648x2736 image (straight on the timeline) with its resized (768x560) version on the same timeline. Made a 720x560 MPEG2 video file and played the file on my fullHD monitor through my PowerDVD8 SW player.
-
Ken Veal
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: msi mpg z390 gaming edge ac lga 1151 ddr4
- processor: 360 gigahertz Intel Core i9 900K
- ram: 32 GB
- Video Card: EVGA GeForceGTX 760 2GB GDDR5 PCI E 3 0
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1250GB SSD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung U28E90 28” UHD 4k
- Corel programs: PaintSPro2021Ult.PhotoMirage.VS.2020 Ult
- Location: London,England
Image Size
jpeg ,RGB True colour, 24bit,Width 3071 Height 1838px,Res 28 px/cm,
size 16,537kb
size 16,537kb
-
Trevor Andrew
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
I uploaded the 2 files in http://users.telenet.be/bettydemey/
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
-
erdna
- Posts: 659
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigsbyte H81M
- processor: I7 4770
- ram: 16GB DDR3
- Video Card: Intel HD4600
- sound_card: Intel display audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB 7200rp
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Panasonic TX32cx600e
- Location: Belgium
Finally I found out that if you don't apply pan/scan on an oversized image it is being rendered without the right filtering, thereby causing aliasing. If pan/scan is being applied and the file rendered, the end result is indeed significantly better. (resolution). I now also uploaded the "problem" .mpg file where the pre-sized, and the oversized image clips were rendered without pan/scan applied. My conclusion is thus, to never use oversized image clips if there is no P/S involved.
-
Trevor Andrew
Hi erdna
Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for the info and sample clips.
Interesting result.
In the past I have always used sizes to match the video frame, only recently increasing (double size) for my slide shows.
I don¡¦t use Pan & Zoom that much so will be taking a good look at the next slide show.
By the way I noticed you used interlaced video, have you try Frame Based for your slide shows.
I realise with video included we would use interlaced. Just a thought.
Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for the info and sample clips.
Interesting result.
In the past I have always used sizes to match the video frame, only recently increasing (double size) for my slide shows.
I don¡¦t use Pan & Zoom that much so will be taking a good look at the next slide show.
By the way I noticed you used interlaced video, have you try Frame Based for your slide shows.
I realise with video included we would use interlaced. Just a thought.
