Hi,
What are peoples thoughts on the setting for the quality slider? It defaults to %70 and whilst it may seem intuitive to simply set it to %100 every time, the user guide suggests that it may impact on 'fluid motion'. Has anyone done any definitive testing on the best use of this option?
Thanks
Quality slider - 70 or 100?
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
dmz
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:58 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Z390-I
- processor: Intel Gen 9 i7 9700K
- ram: 32GB
- Video Card: mobo onboard
- sound_card: mobo onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Dell
- Corel programs: VS 2020
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Hi dmz --
jchunter has probably done testing.
I always move the slider to 100%. Can't see any reason not to, at this stage. Later, if my video file is too big to fit onto a DVD, I go to DVD Shrink and let it reduce it by just the amount necessary to fit.
Alternatively I might try serial bitrate settings starting at 8264 (my favorite) and going down to 8000, 6000, etc. till things fit. Not too sophisticated an approach.
Keith
jchunter has probably done testing.
I always move the slider to 100%. Can't see any reason not to, at this stage. Later, if my video file is too big to fit onto a DVD, I go to DVD Shrink and let it reduce it by just the amount necessary to fit.
Alternatively I might try serial bitrate settings starting at 8264 (my favorite) and going down to 8000, 6000, etc. till things fit. Not too sophisticated an approach.
Keith
-
MikeGunter
Hi Keith,kebrinton wrote: I always move the slider to 100%. Can't see any reason not to ...
Probably not, but the key setting is at 70 for a reason. In most circumstances, (I have to give myself a little out
There is more quantatization, but that doesn't mean it will do much.
Mike
-
Masami
Moving the slider to %100 DOES increase the quality, but it's at a point where any noticable difference is trivial if anything.
It actually does not increase the file size, only the KBPS does that.
What it does do however, is increase the chance of dropped frames, causing either stuttering video or else A/V sync issues.
If you're not suffering from either of these problems, then you might as well stick with 100%, but if you start encountering problems like these, then drop it back down to 70%
It actually does not increase the file size, only the KBPS does that.
What it does do however, is increase the chance of dropped frames, causing either stuttering video or else A/V sync issues.
If you're not suffering from either of these problems, then you might as well stick with 100%, but if you start encountering problems like these, then drop it back down to 70%
only if capturing...
This is only if you are capturing and converting to mpeg on the-fly. if you have a video already on your hard drive, then this should not increase the chance of dropped frames.Masami wrote:What it does do however, is increase the chance of dropped frames, causing either stuttering video or else A/V sync issues.
Whether or not the transcode buffer prevents dropped frames will depend on how you are feeding the video into your computer. But if your buffer fills up, there can be a slight "pause" or hiccup where it stopped/started capture. And if you are feeding an analog source into an analog-to-dv converter, there won;t be any way to stop the analog source when the transcode buffer is being flushed -- causing a loss in that section of your input video.
George
-
Wairoakid
