maxfrost01 wrote: You're focusing too much on my mother-in-law (which is not an easy thing to do). My point is the coincidence of events i.e. that 3 key members of my vast family audience are getting problems with the DVDs I send them even though each of those DVDs plays fine on my DVD player before I put them in the mail.
My points related to all of your discs
Skier - discs are good quality,
Sony's appear to have a variety of dye, try choosing Verbatim, a good brand you should be able to pick up anywhere, or look for Taiyo Yuden discs.
I go for a slower burn rate (8x), Depends what you max burn speed is, 8x, 16x for dvds, try burning at 4x next.
and the TV/DVD connections are only relevant if I assume the errors experienced by all 3 users are coincidence and separate issues.
The tv/dvd connection was based on your Mom's problem of poor quality a loose scart can cause colour problems, but if she doesn't experience problems with any other dds, then we are back to the problem that I feel you have and most of the others,which is compatibility of your burned disc with the player. and the above takes precedence.
Question: If I try the bitrate at 7500 might that stop these kind of problems? Or is bitrate nothing to do with quality and playability of DVDs?
Can be everything to do with it, which is why I suggested lowering it.
I know a good way to find out is to try it, but before I start burning and mailing my DVDs around the globe I just wondered if it made sense to any of you gurus that the 8000 constant bitrate could be the cause?
Could be,
Your swift reponse to my problem would be appreciated.
So would more humour.
My mother-in-law and the constant video data rate
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
Hi, Graham
Thanks for the response and particularly for the way you've hit each point!
I've just been looking at the Taiyo Yuden DVDs - are they the best you've come across? Would you go +R or -R? I use +R at the moment. And I thought I might as well try the 8x (rather than 16x) as I always go for a slower burn speed anyway! Your thoughts?
I've just burned a couple of DVDs at 7500 bitrate and they play superbly well on my DVD player.
Next step is the mother-in-law. Fingers crossed.
Thanks for the response and particularly for the way you've hit each point!
I've just been looking at the Taiyo Yuden DVDs - are they the best you've come across? Would you go +R or -R? I use +R at the moment. And I thought I might as well try the 8x (rather than 16x) as I always go for a slower burn speed anyway! Your thoughts?
I've just burned a couple of DVDs at 7500 bitrate and they play superbly well on my DVD player.
Next step is the mother-in-law. Fingers crossed.
Max
The colour problem has me baffled. I don't know what could cause one disc on one player to have colour problems. The only thing I can think of, is that maybe you made an NTSC disc, and this player doesn't do well with NTSC discs. Is there any chance that happened????
The other problems sound like "physical problems"... Like somehow you're getting a "bad burn", or maybe you've got a batch of bad blank discs (This has happened to me). Different players do have different tolerances for this kind of thing.
The best way to determine if it's a problem with the MPEG-2 file or a physical DVD problem with the DVD is to burn another DVD. If the 2nd DVD has a problem at exactly the same place, it's the file. If the 2nd DVD has no problems, or probelms at a different spot, it's the physical DVD.
You can also test the DVD with Nero CD-DVD Speed. I've started testing all of my burns with this program. It will usually show you if there's a (physical) glicth on the DVD. (It won't know if you have "bad data", it will just tell you if it has any trouble reading the disc.)
The other problems sound like "physical problems"... Like somehow you're getting a "bad burn", or maybe you've got a batch of bad blank discs (This has happened to me). Different players do have different tolerances for this kind of thing.
The best way to determine if it's a problem with the MPEG-2 file or a physical DVD problem with the DVD is to burn another DVD. If the 2nd DVD has a problem at exactly the same place, it's the file. If the 2nd DVD has no problems, or probelms at a different spot, it's the physical DVD.
You can also test the DVD with Nero CD-DVD Speed. I've started testing all of my burns with this program. It will usually show you if there's a (physical) glicth on the DVD. (It won't know if you have "bad data", it will just tell you if it has any trouble reading the disc.)
[size=92][i]Head over heels,
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
-
alanball
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 4:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Gigabyte Technology B450M H
- processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2TB+480SSD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: ASUS VN247
- Corel programs: VS10, VS2018 Ultimate, VS2021 Ultimate
- Location: Auckland New Zealand
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
Doug,
I suspect that my mother-in-law's colour problem is unrelated to the disc problems my other viewers (aka family) have been having. Knowing my mother-in-law's relationship with technology it's most likely that it's a connection/settings problem in the TV or DVD player. And so far in this thread no-one seems to be suggesting poor quality colour is a recognised burn problem.
I don't think it's a bad batch of DVDs. I've been using them for a while and I never get a problem with any DVD I burn and test on my DVD player - it only happens after I put them in the mail (maybe I need to speak with my mailman?
) I think it's more likely to be the burn or compatability of disc with their DVD players.
Nero CD-DVD Speed sounds like a useful piece of kit. I already have Nero 8 but cant' see it in there. Is it a free download? I couldn't tell from the link you sent me if I was going to get a clean, free copy or if it was going to tell me it would cost $300 to activate after download!
I suspect that my mother-in-law's colour problem is unrelated to the disc problems my other viewers (aka family) have been having. Knowing my mother-in-law's relationship with technology it's most likely that it's a connection/settings problem in the TV or DVD player. And so far in this thread no-one seems to be suggesting poor quality colour is a recognised burn problem.
I don't think it's a bad batch of DVDs. I've been using them for a while and I never get a problem with any DVD I burn and test on my DVD player - it only happens after I put them in the mail (maybe I need to speak with my mailman?
Nero CD-DVD Speed sounds like a useful piece of kit. I already have Nero 8 but cant' see it in there. Is it a free download? I couldn't tell from the link you sent me if I was going to get a clean, free copy or if it was going to tell me it would cost $300 to activate after download!
Max
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
Alan,
Your comment on +R vs -R is really interesting.
I'm pretty sure that when I first began using VS (back in the days when you were winning the World Cup for England
) I would use +R and -R - whichever was closest to my desktop at the time.
Then, after checking out different websites and this forum, I seem to remember I decided that +R was the way to go. Don't ask me why. I can't remember that bit. I know that some machines only play one and not the other but I think most modern machines will play anything now!
Anyone else want to add a comment on the +R or -R great debate? Anyone find that one is significantly more reliable than the other?
Your comment on +R vs -R is really interesting.
I'm pretty sure that when I first began using VS (back in the days when you were winning the World Cup for England
Then, after checking out different websites and this forum, I seem to remember I decided that +R was the way to go. Don't ask me why. I can't remember that bit. I know that some machines only play one and not the other but I think most modern machines will play anything now!
Anyone else want to add a comment on the +R or -R great debate? Anyone find that one is significantly more reliable than the other?
Max
-
mitchell65
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:50 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Dell Inc. 04GJJT A00
- processor: 2.80 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad Core
- ram: 4Gb
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
- sound_card: Realtek High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 560Gb Sata
- Location: Cornwall UK
Multiply the number of regular members of this Forum by the number of disc manufacturers by the number of types of DVD's they make multiplied by the first number you thought of and that's about the number of different opinions you can expectmaxfrost01 wrote:Anyone find that one is significantly more reliable than the other? Thank You
John Mitchell
We all make mistakes, that's why pencils have erasers on the end!
We all make mistakes, that's why pencils have erasers on the end!
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
I make hundreds (thousands) of copies of tens of dvds each week for clients.
I prefer -R discs.
Taiyo Yuden are the best I've come across.
I use a bitrate of max 7500 for video and generally 192 or maybe a little higher for audio.
I wouldn't worry about buying 16x discs, they will be the latest design and better quality, just burn them slowly. I buy 16x discs and burn at 4x.
Can you make a visit to MIL? Check out her system. Take your dvd player with you for comparison?
I prefer -R discs.
Taiyo Yuden are the best I've come across.
I use a bitrate of max 7500 for video and generally 192 or maybe a little higher for audio.
I wouldn't worry about buying 16x discs, they will be the latest design and better quality, just burn them slowly. I buy 16x discs and burn at 4x.
Can you make a visit to MIL? Check out her system. Take your dvd player with you for comparison?
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
-
mitchell65
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:50 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Dell Inc. 04GJJT A00
- processor: 2.80 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad Core
- ram: 4Gb
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
- sound_card: Realtek High Definition Audio
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 560Gb Sata
- Location: Cornwall UK
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
-
sjj1805
- Posts: 14383
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Equium P200-178
- processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
- ram: 2 GB
- Video Card: Intel 945 Express
- sound_card: Intel GMA 950
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
- Location: Birmingham UK
AS mentioned by Graham (Skier-Hughes) lower your BURN SPEED.
Please see DVD Burning / Playback issues
Please see DVD Burning / Playback issues
-
maxfrost01
- Posts: 274
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
- processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
- ram: 6 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
- Location: London
Steve,
Perfect! Great summary of burn speeds et al.
So good I've printed it off and filed it.
btw I do search the forum before I post but it ain't easy to find what I'm looking for. And I'm really not sure I use the search facility to best effect.
For example if I enter 'Burn Speeds' in the text box should I then select "Search for any terms or use query as entered" or should I go for "Search for all terms"? The former seems to be self-contradictory as it sounds like it will search for 'Burn' or 'Speeds' or 'Burn Speeds'. And the latter is not much clearer!
Hiow do I get it to search for the PHRASE 'Burn Speeds'?
Sorry to bug you , but as I'm sure you've worked out, better use of the search engine might just save you and others like you a lot of time re-answering queries from me and people like me!
Perfect! Great summary of burn speeds et al.
So good I've printed it off and filed it.
btw I do search the forum before I post but it ain't easy to find what I'm looking for. And I'm really not sure I use the search facility to best effect.
For example if I enter 'Burn Speeds' in the text box should I then select "Search for any terms or use query as entered" or should I go for "Search for all terms"? The former seems to be self-contradictory as it sounds like it will search for 'Burn' or 'Speeds' or 'Burn Speeds'. And the latter is not much clearer!
Hiow do I get it to search for the PHRASE 'Burn Speeds'?
Sorry to bug you , but as I'm sure you've worked out, better use of the search engine might just save you and others like you a lot of time re-answering queries from me and people like me!
Max
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
I've been using php forums for ages and still not worked out how to find the answer to my question using search.
I tried
Burn and Speeds
Got your post as first reply, then "please read this before posting", which contains the article Steve relates to, but too be honest, if I was quickly looking for an answer I would most likley have skipped that one
as the title bears no relation to my query.
So long as people are happy with the answers given most here don't mind pointing you to the answer rather than retyping it. It's when people come backa dn say that was no use, when it quite clearly answers their question adn they haven't bothered to read it
I tried
Burn and Speeds
Got your post as first reply, then "please read this before posting", which contains the article Steve relates to, but too be honest, if I was quickly looking for an answer I would most likley have skipped that one
So long as people are happy with the answers given most here don't mind pointing you to the answer rather than retyping it. It's when people come backa dn say that was no use, when it quite clearly answers their question adn they haven't bothered to read it
