Corel VideoStudio Pro X2

Moderator: Ken Berry

skyml
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:40 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Sony VIAO 64bit
processor: Intel Quad Core i7
ram: 6GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce with Cuda
sound_card: on motherboard
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 650GB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Sony VIAO 17"
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by skyml »

Hey Ken,

I agree that VS in any form was not intended to be a replacement to MSP. But, because of our many discussions in both VS and MSP forums over the last two years I simply felt that we had almost been promised many more features in the form of a "Pro" version of VS and that the pro version of this VS X2 is nothing even close. Perhaps Corel should have called it VS basic and VS ultimate instead of standard and pro because there is nothing "pro" about VS.

I read the other post you listed and it makes me sad in a way... I remember the power we had when MSP supported third party filters and effects programs like Boris and Xplode from Canopus (what a pair Canopus and Ulead where back then).

Our input was asked for and I sure wanted certian features saved and passed over to VS from MSP (transitions in the overlay tracks and overlay clips for fade and transition effects are an example)... the features I wanted were features that leave me frustrated with programs like Avid, Vegas and Premier. I was wrong in hoping that the "Pro"version of VS would satisfy me in that way.
Last edited by skyml on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

Pro this, pro that. The only thing that makes it "pro" is the ability and creativity of the user.

Give me a talented and creative editor using Windows Movie Maker and he will make a better video than a no-talent using Premier Pro.

MSP users need to stop crying. What's done is done. If what Corel has to offer is not good enough then please move on to something else.
skyml
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:40 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Sony VIAO 64bit
processor: Intel Quad Core i7
ram: 6GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce with Cuda
sound_card: on motherboard
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 650GB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Sony VIAO 17"
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by skyml »

Ya right, and I bet you can make gold from led too.....

If what Corel did is not good enough then I as the customer (their reason for doing business) have the right and obligation to ask them to do better! No crying here... just want better tools from the company that owns the right to them.

For many, other high end editors like Avid, Premier, Vegas are lacking in tools and user features that Corel ownes the rights too (in MSP for example). VS "Pro" was promised to be better and the needs and wants of high end editors who held on awaiting that promise were let down (IMHO).

Creativity and ability are all proportional to the tools and materials availbe to the artist.... do you think a the Mona Lisa would have been just as well if the artist was given water colors and cardboard to paint on? Go prove how great you are building a complex project in Windows movie maker...let's see you do 1/10th of what many need to do.

VS X2 is still VS with more and more "advanced" features being added from the high end editor programs proving that the needs and wants of the starting video enthusits are growing.

Corel failed to support a portion of the market in a product they purchased with Ulead - that was their choice and many either quit or moved on (with their money) to other company's who would support them (and many were forced to compromised to do this). Some dummied down to VS with the hope that some of the tools and features they loved in MSP would carry over. It sorta happened but not on the scale I hoped.

Imagine if Camera manufactors decided to stop producing SLR cameras when the market went to digital forcing the pros' and serious ametures to either go to more expensive medium format cameras or struggle with the smaller and limited point and shoot cameras. Camera manufactors know that there is a sizeable market out there for them to make good money on the DSLR camera and they are monopolyizing on it... too bad Corel didn't do that for the Prosumer video editing market.

Like I said, oh well.
stelch
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 8:40 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Fujitsu Siemens
processor: Intel Xeon processor E31240 8 MB 3.30 GHzz
ram: 8GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Quadro 2000 1GB
sound_card: Realtek
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 x 1 Terr
Location: Nicosia Cyprus

Post by stelch »

You know I am using VS for my Videography job particularlly making wedding videos, and so far none of my clients complained that my products are inferior to anyone; and I know I have seen some wedding videos done by my competitors using vegas and premier ( I know that info from an insider) and I can tell you that they were "pathetic". So with VS and your imagination you can do wonders!
So I agree with Jeff that "The only thing that makes it "pro" is the ability and creativity of the user."

Stelios
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

If what Corel did is not good enough then I as the customer (their reason for doing business) have the right and obligation to ask them to do better! No crying here... just want better tools from the company that owns the right to them.
So complain to Corel and stop muddying up this forum. You know as well as anyone that reps from Corel rarely visit this forum, and I would hazard a guess that the ones that make the ultimate decisions never have and never will.
VS "Pro" was promised to be better and the needs and wants of high end editors who held on awaiting that promise were let down (IMHO).
It is better! It was NEVER promised that it would be a reincarnation of MSP.
Creativity and ability are all proportional to the tools and materials availbe to the artist.... do you think a the Mona Lisa would have been just as well if the artist was given water colors and cardboard to paint on?
YES! When compared to Joe Schmoe, which was precisely my point.
Go prove how great you are building a complex project in Windows movie maker...let's see you do 1/10th of what many need to do.
I never said I was great. But again, my comparison was a person with great talent using limited resources versus someone with limited talent using virtually unlimited resources.
Corel failed to support a portion of the market in a product they purchased with Ulead - that was their choice and many either quit or moved on (with their money) to other company's who would support them (and many were forced to compromised to do this). Some dummied down to VS with the hope that some of the tools and features they loved in MSP would carry over. It sorta happened but not on the scale I hoped. Imagine if Camera manufactors decided to stop producing SLR cameras when the market went to digital forcing the pros' and serious ametures to either go to more expensive medium format cameras or struggle with the smaller and limited point and shoot cameras. Camera manufactors know that there is a sizeable market out there for them to make good money on the DSLR camera and they are monopolyizing on it... too bad Corel didn't do that for the Prosumer video editing market.
I agree 100%. But obviously Corel is moving away from the high-end user. They just can't compete with the likes of Adobe, Apple and Sony (I'm speaking on a marketing level). I subscribe to a number of video editing magazine. Many of them have contests, and I have NEVER seen a winner of a contest use MSP or any other Ulead/Corel product. It's always Adobe, Apple or Sony. Not that MSP is an inferior product or its users are not as skilled, but it's a numbers game. There are many, many more users of Adobe, Apple or Sony. They have the market share, and apparently Corel doesn't want to spend the money it takes to run with the big boys.

Skyml, our perspectives are not that far off. I'm just tired of the MSP users still griping over it. Like I said, the milk is spilt. Clean it up and get a new glass. :wink:
skyml
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:40 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Sony VIAO 64bit
processor: Intel Quad Core i7
ram: 6GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Geforce with Cuda
sound_card: on motherboard
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 650GB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Sony VIAO 17"
Location: Orange County, CA
Contact:

Post by skyml »

Jeff,

I hope my comments rally support form other users in this forum to initiate change we want or need - as I said there is no crying here. You see I am trying to clean up the mess Corel left us and I did get a new glass as you said - VS Pro was going to be it and you are right, it is better then it was but just not in the way I had hoped.

Corel moved closer into our corner partially by listening to us here in this forum. Please don't confuse disappointment and desire with griping.

Mike
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

Then Mike, it might be better to start a new thread for your campaign, so your message doesn't get lost amongst all the banter surrounding the new release.
babdi
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 8:48 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: ASRock Extreme 11
processor: Intel 3770K
ram: 32 GB DDR3
Video Card: Asus 660TI 2 GB
sound_card: On board Realtek
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 6.128 TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 22",BenQ 2222 LCD HD 1920x1080
Corel programs: Video studio
Location: Mumbai,India

Post by babdi »

I would loved if Corel had included motion path in PIP. It is great feature which they could moved from MSP. Even lesser video editing software like cyberlink power director have had it since version 6. I hope people agree with me.
There is a light within a light and a shadow within a shadow. - Rembrandt
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Post by Ron P. »

babdi wrote:I would loved if Corel had included motion path in PIP. It is great feature which they could moved from MSP. Even lesser video editing software like cyberlink power director have had it since version 6. I hope people agree with me.
I'm sure that there are many of us that agree 100%. However Corel and even Ulead has a "M.O" regarding features. They're not going to add but one or two per version. I've seen this since VS8. You ask for certain things, and it may be implemented 2-3 versions later. They're good at baiting the customers. Motion Paths were requested back in VS9, VS10, and VS11, along with cutting clips in overlay tracks, transitions in overlay tracks, and so on. If you would look at the previous versions, you could see that only a few are added at a time.
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
sjj1805
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
operating_system: Windows XP Pro
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Equium P200-178
processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
ram: 2 GB
Video Card: Intel 945 Express
sound_card: Intel GMA 950
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
Location: Birmingham UK

Post by sjj1805 »

What is being overlooked here is that Tobie Openshaw created the following post duplicated in the VideoStudio and MediaStudio forums.

Your input please: MSP to VideoStudio "PRO"? (MediaStudio)
Your input please: VideoStudio "PRO"? (VideoStudio)

Now instead of our forum members all getting behind Tobie and giving him the support he required - He is after all just a cog in the wheel and so needs to evidence to the hierarchy a need for a "Pro" product and thus obtain the necessary funding and support. Instead the feedback was mostly negative and did not really help Tobie (to help us) much.

Tobie could have simply thrown in the towel but instead has soldiered on and as a result I am sure that VSX2 Pro is more powerful now that it would have otherwise been. (Thank you Tobie :D )

VSX2 is now the FIRST STEP towards making a new more powerful product more akin to MediaStudio. O.K. there is a long long way to go yet BUT those who have owned/used MediaStudio in the past are in a very powerful position by being able to make SENSIBLE and REALISTIC suggestions in our Wish List

Like Ron has pointed out - they appear to dribble out a few extras at a time. VS10 included extra video tracks. VS11 then introduced being able to make cuts to those video tracks. VSX2 now adds transitions to the overlay tracks.

So that we as a user group can get what we want we need to concentrate our efforts on what is the next most important item that we would want ported from MediaStudio. We are NOT going to get it all in one go.

My vote is that we make a push for "Moving Paths."

We now have a sort of resizable interface - again - nothing as elaborate as MSP8 - but slowly we are moving in the right direction.
maxfrost01
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
ram: 6 GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
Location: London

Post by maxfrost01 »

I've just placed my order for the boxed version of VSPro Ultimate. I gather it's going to take best part of a week to get to me. Sad as I'd like to get started but I do like to have those discs handy for the inevitable reinstall that's going to happen sometime :roll:

But I really would like to give the news software a try right now (that delayed gratification stuff has just never worked for me).

So, any reason why I shouldn't download the TBYB version then install from the disks when they arive? Anyone done that? Does it create any kind of a problem using a downloaded TBYB then not downloading the full version?
Max
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

That's what I am doing as I wait for my box (might be here today :D ). I would, however, recommend removing the trial version before installing the full version.
maxfrost01
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 3:49 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Intel Corporation DX58SO AAE29331-501
processor: Intel i7 920 2.67GHz
ram: 6 GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2.2 TB
Location: London

Post by maxfrost01 »

Thanks for the quick response, Jeff.

Can you remove the trial version without touching 11.5? ie remove it without removing any/all earlier versions?
Max
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

Sure, I have versions 9, 10, and X2 on my machine.
Bignosetw
Site Admin
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 12:05 pm

Post by Bignosetw »

Thanks for the kind words, sjjj, and yes, please keep that wish list going. Don't forget I am also a video editor, so moving paths is right up there for me too :)

Tobie
Post Reply