Deinterlacing video
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:00 pm
I'm a complete newbie regarding video editing software, but not with video in general.
I have recorded many different videos of traffic using an ordinary, non-HD, non progressive scan surveillance camera on a Pioneer DVD recorder (which doesn't feature progressive scan either). Of course, when playing back these videos on windows media player (or any other for that matter), I get interlace artifacts when I pause the video. [I need a good still shot of the licence plate.]
A couple of months ago I downloaded & installed the trial version of WinDVD 9.0 and it worked perfectly to properly de-interlace the video and thus produce a crystal clear paused shot with no artifacts/blur. I intended to purchase WinDVD 9.0, but I recently developed a need to produce short movies based on these recordings. That's why I downloaded the trial version of VideoStudio 11. VideoStudio's ability to take jpg snapshots of a video has made me consider buying it instead of WinDVD 9.0, as well as my newfound need for video editing.
My problem is that no matter what I set the "default field order" to (LFF, UFF, or frame based), VideoStudio won't de-interlace the video at all. As a matter of fact, I see no difference in the video no matter what the default field order is set to. This leads me to believe that I'm misunderstanding how VideoStudio is handling the issue (which is virtually 100% certain).
What setting should I use when I initially capture the video from a DVD-R? Will I see de-interlaced images while I'm editing the video, or only after I've exported the finished product? Does the target export type have any bearing on whether de-interlacing is done properly? I want to export to an "online-ready" format, such as that used for YouTube. I realize that much resolution is lost in the conversion, but I can live with a reduction in resolution so long as I can de-interlace the video.
Help?
I have recorded many different videos of traffic using an ordinary, non-HD, non progressive scan surveillance camera on a Pioneer DVD recorder (which doesn't feature progressive scan either). Of course, when playing back these videos on windows media player (or any other for that matter), I get interlace artifacts when I pause the video. [I need a good still shot of the licence plate.]
A couple of months ago I downloaded & installed the trial version of WinDVD 9.0 and it worked perfectly to properly de-interlace the video and thus produce a crystal clear paused shot with no artifacts/blur. I intended to purchase WinDVD 9.0, but I recently developed a need to produce short movies based on these recordings. That's why I downloaded the trial version of VideoStudio 11. VideoStudio's ability to take jpg snapshots of a video has made me consider buying it instead of WinDVD 9.0, as well as my newfound need for video editing.
My problem is that no matter what I set the "default field order" to (LFF, UFF, or frame based), VideoStudio won't de-interlace the video at all. As a matter of fact, I see no difference in the video no matter what the default field order is set to. This leads me to believe that I'm misunderstanding how VideoStudio is handling the issue (which is virtually 100% certain).
What setting should I use when I initially capture the video from a DVD-R? Will I see de-interlaced images while I'm editing the video, or only after I've exported the finished product? Does the target export type have any bearing on whether de-interlacing is done properly? I want to export to an "online-ready" format, such as that used for YouTube. I realize that much resolution is lost in the conversion, but I can live with a reduction in resolution so long as I can de-interlace the video.
Help?