Hi Team.
My single layer burns play perfectly but my dual layer's play fine up until what I assume is the layer change and there they freeze. I've tried playing them on serveral different DVD players and it makes no difference. Can anyone help please.
Dual layer dvd freezes when played.
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
MikeB51
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:37 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Foxconn - A75M
- processor: AMD A4-3300 APU X2
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung SyncMaster 23 vis
- Location: Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
My experience with DL discs is very mixed. The first one I did actually worked. All the subsequent ones either would not do the transition between layers (on computer playback) or didn't play sensibly at all (on set-top boxes). I've tried 3 different well-known makes of blanks: no difference - I've also tried 2 different DL burners with latest firmware. I've given up wasting time and money on what I deem to be an imperfect technology.
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
I've had mixed results too... I'd guess that 25% of my dual-layer discs turn-out to be bad. I suspect it's the blank discs...
I've started testing all of my burns with Nero CD/DVD Speed (FREE!!!). And, I avoid dual-layer discs whenever possible.
Some DVD players have trouble with "burned" dual-layer discs. My player can play them, but I know of two people who's DVD players cannot play dual layer discs at all. Some players can play -RDL, but not +RDL or vice-versa.
If the DVD won't play on your computer, then you have some sort of "physical" problem. You may have a bad blank disc (or a bad batch of blanks), or your burner just "doesn't like" that brand/batch. Or, you are burning at too-high of a speed. Or you may have a bad burner, etc.
Some DVD players have trouble with "burned" dual-layer discs. My player can play them, but I know of two people who's DVD players cannot play dual layer discs at all. Some players can play -RDL, but not +RDL or vice-versa.
If the DVD won't play on your computer, then you have some sort of "physical" problem. You may have a bad blank disc (or a bad batch of blanks), or your burner just "doesn't like" that brand/batch. Or, you are burning at too-high of a speed. Or you may have a bad burner, etc.
[size=92][i]Head over heels,
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
-
MikeB51
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:37 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Foxconn - A75M
- processor: AMD A4-3300 APU X2
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung SyncMaster 23 vis
- Location: Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
-
hdspringer98
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 2:30 am
-
MikeB51
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:37 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: Foxconn - A75M
- processor: AMD A4-3300 APU X2
- ram: 8GB
- Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
- sound_card: High Definition Audio Device
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Samsung SyncMaster 23 vis
- Location: Rockhampton, Qld, Australia
I've used Verbatim (amongst other well-known makes) DLs at slow burn speeds without success, with 2 modern burners and latest firmware.
IMHO, DL is a waste of time and money for distribution, because few set-top players can cope with them (OK for pressed DL, but not photopolymer ones). From experience, you are better off with either 1 SL and a small drop in quality (often insignificant) or 2 SLs with the inconvenience of a coffee break in the middle of viewing.
Remember also, that most Hollywood blockbusters, although DL, are encoded at only 4000-5000 kbit/s average. This is because of all the "extras" they add, such as trailers, bloopers, the life history of the 3rd supporting actress, 28 sub title tracks, 8 sound tracks, fancy menus, Easter eggs and Goodness knows what else. It is a malady of our age that makes people think that bigger is better, where bitrates are concerned. Bigger is often a stick you break over your own back.
IMHO, DL is a waste of time and money for distribution, because few set-top players can cope with them (OK for pressed DL, but not photopolymer ones). From experience, you are better off with either 1 SL and a small drop in quality (often insignificant) or 2 SLs with the inconvenience of a coffee break in the middle of viewing.
Remember also, that most Hollywood blockbusters, although DL, are encoded at only 4000-5000 kbit/s average. This is because of all the "extras" they add, such as trailers, bloopers, the life history of the 3rd supporting actress, 28 sub title tracks, 8 sound tracks, fancy menus, Easter eggs and Goodness knows what else. It is a malady of our age that makes people think that bigger is better, where bitrates are concerned. Bigger is often a stick you break over your own back.
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
