ppanis wrote:
I made a movie from 20 pictures (good quality pictures bought from stock photography)... Because 20 pictures one after the other with a cross-fade effect between each were making a shorter movie than the piece of music I wanted to "illustrate" my pictures with, I doubled each picture first (=> succession of 40 pictures)
There was no need to insert each picture twice in order to increase the duration. I doubt that it reduces the quality, but it's just more work than necessary. As Clevo said, you can go into the timeline view (as opposed to storyboard view) and then simply drag the yellow bars to increase the clip duration.
Alternatively, if you're a bit anal like me, you can click on the clip on your timeline and then adjust the duration shown in the box under
"Image" to the right of the preview window (in the default and type 4 ui layouts)
ppanis wrote:and then, because it was still not long enough, I reduced the speed of almost 30% to get to exactly to the same length of my piece of music...
How did you reduce the speed to 30%? Did you render the project to a file, and then insert it into the timeline of another project, or even your original one with the timeline cleared, and render again at 30%?
ppanis wrote:Unfortunately, after rendering/sharing into a mpeg2 my movie shows jitter, is it because of the slower motion ?
If you did reduce the speed by the method described above, you will see jitter in the transitions, although not in the static images. Even if you rendered the file to a DV avi file, and then re-rendered that with the speed set to 30% to an mpeg2 file, you will see a loss of picture quality too.
ppanis wrote:if yes, how should I do to extend the length of my "slide show", would it be by adding still more frames than the double ?
Just drag the yellow bars of original image clips on your timeline, or edit the duration in the duration box under
"Image"
You can also change the duration of the transitions, and if you do this in the same way as for the image clips, you won't see the jitter in the transitions that you will be using your previous method. Note that because of the overlapping way that the transitions work, as described by Vidoman, the transition duration cannot be more than about half the duration of the adjacent image clips.
ppanis wrote:I use Ulead Videostudio v.11 and here are my movie properties:
NTSC drop frame (29.97 fps)
MPEG files
24 bits, 720 x 480, 29.97 fps
Lower Field First
(DVD-NTSC), 4:3
Video data rate: Variable (Max. 6000 kbps)
Audio data rate: 224 kbps
MPEG audio layer 2, 48 KHz, Stereo
Nothing wrong with those. In my tests, I was not able to produce jitter simply by using lower field first or upper field first, so I don't think you need to use frame based.
You could raise the video bitrate to 8000kbps or more if using compressed audio.
Variable bitrate is definitely advantageous for slideshows, since the static image sections can be encoded with a very low bitrate. Just check out the file size difference if you encode the same project to CBR!
DVD resolution is only 720 x 480, or 720 x 576. If your images are significantly larger than that, you will be able to use pan and zoom effects. That can add a lot of interest to a slideshow, as well as sucking up hours of your time!
Good luck!
