HDV (1080i) Title is bed size
-
Arekwp
HDV (1080i) Title is bed size
Why
Project 1440/1080
video source HDV Sony FX1/Z1
Add title - title visible format 4:3
WHY ??
Project 1440/1080
video source HDV Sony FX1/Z1
Add title - title visible format 4:3
WHY ??
-
intersilmultimedia
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:08 pm
- Location: Palm Bay, FL
- Contact:
Re: HDV (1080i) Title is bed size
Because 1440:1080 is 4:3Arekwp wrote:Why
Project 1440/1080
video source HDV Sony FX1/Z1
Add title - title visible format 4:3
-
VideoKillers
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:39 pm
HDV 1080i in 16:9 ratio is 1920x1080, not 1440x1080. Your cam shoots anamorphically in 4:3 to give you the impression of 16:9.
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
-
VideoKillers
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:39 pm
DV 16:9 is letter-boxed. HDV 1080i 16:9 is 1920x1080. If shot in 1440x1080, it has anamorphic compression, because 1440x1080 is 4:3.
Blame the camera for being 4:3!
Blame the camera for being 4:3!
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
Exactly, that is what I said: it is letter-boxed. If used in 16:9, only the centre 720x405 pixels are used for the image, the rest being black. AFAIK, I don't think DV cams had anamorphic compression for 16:9. Both my high-end cams have letter-boxing (which I never use!) with the reduced vertical pixel use. Actually, I think it is bloody useless!Gorf wrote:No it isn't. DV is 720x576 or 720x480 regardless of the picture aspect ratio.Devil wrote:DV 16:9 is letter-boxed....
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
OK having read up on it a bit, it sounds like it's a setting available on some cameras- you can either use full-frame 16:9 or letterboxed 4:3.
Although full-frame should be better because the whole DV frame is being used for compression, some cameras (Sony was mentioned) introduce edge artefacts when stretching the crop to fit the frame. In these circumstances you should, if your camera supports it, letterbox to 4:3 as the black borders will compress well, leaving more of the bitrate for the actual picture. Otherwise, shoot 4:3 and crop to 16:9 in the editor.
Not that any of this tangent helps the OP at all...
Although full-frame should be better because the whole DV frame is being used for compression, some cameras (Sony was mentioned) introduce edge artefacts when stretching the crop to fit the frame. In these circumstances you should, if your camera supports it, letterbox to 4:3 as the black borders will compress well, leaving more of the bitrate for the actual picture. Otherwise, shoot 4:3 and crop to 16:9 in the editor.
Not that any of this tangent helps the OP at all...
