Still image quality is inferior.

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
janjatul
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:58 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte
processor: Intel Core i5
ram: 8 GB
Video Card: On MB
sound_card: On MB
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 TB
Location: Sweden

Still image quality is inferior.

Post by janjatul »

I want to use some still images in my video, but I can not get the quality of the still images to be as good as the video. The sharpness is lower. This means that when I play the resulting video there is a disturbing change in picture quality while the still image is displayed on the screen.
I have tried to resample the still image in PhotoImpact to various pixel sizes but I have not been able to get the original quality of the still image.
As I want to pan a little which image size is optimal.
I have saved my images as jpgs with 95%. My video is PAL.

Any ideas or suggestions would be most welcome!

Thanks
Clevo
Advisor
Posts: 1243
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 2:39 am
operating_system: Vista Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Asus PK5
processor: Intel Quad CPU Q6600 2.40GHz
ram: 4GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
sound_card: Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 850GB
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Clevo »

Where did you source the stills from?
janjatul
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:58 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte
processor: Intel Core i5
ram: 8 GB
Video Card: On MB
sound_card: On MB
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 TB
Location: Sweden

Post by janjatul »

The stills are coming from my Canon Digital Ixus 800 IS (Powershot Digital Elph 6.0 Mpixs). They look great printed on paper or in Photo Explorer/PhotoImpact.
Jan

Long time (since the low digits) VideStudio and PhotoImpact user now on VS X7 and PI X3 running Win7.
Digital camcorder is Panasonic HDC-TM60.
PC with 128 GB SSD and 1 TB HD plus ext 1 TB HD usb.
Trevor Andrew

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi

I use 768px x 576px (minimum size) for my image sizes.

If I intend to use Pan and Zoom, some quality loss will be experienced when Zooming in.
To compensate I increase the pixel size to 1536 x 1152.

What size (pixels) images are you using?
janjatul
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:58 pm
operating_system: Windows 7 Professional
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte
processor: Intel Core i5
ram: 8 GB
Video Card: On MB
sound_card: On MB
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 TB
Location: Sweden

Post by janjatul »

I have tried various sizes between 2000 to 768px (width).

When you insert your pics to you get a quality that reflects the quality of your originals?
Jan

Long time (since the low digits) VideStudio and PhotoImpact user now on VS X7 and PI X3 running Win7.
Digital camcorder is Panasonic HDC-TM60.
PC with 128 GB SSD and 1 TB HD plus ext 1 TB HD usb.
Trevor Andrew

Post by Trevor Andrew »

Hi

The quality of my inserted images are as good as the originals. (usually Jpeg at 768 x 576) No pan and zoom

Playback, as viewed on the preview screen may be a little slow depending on the amount of editing., but once rendered and burned to disc show very good.
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

This subject has been discussed many times. Some people, such as myself, never have to change the size of my pics. I just import them from my camera and they look great, even if I use Pan & Zoom. Maybe it's a hardware issue (graphics card?) since some have problems and some don't.
DLA
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by DLA »

In File/Preferences, Edit tab, do you have the Resampling quality set to Best?

I never tested with the various settings there to see the difference but I always used Best and the Compression/Quality slider bar to 100 for rendering and like Black Lab used my pics straight out of my 8 Mpixels camera and the quality was always excellent, even with pan & zoom.
Black Lab
Posts: 7429
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:11 pm
operating_system: Windows 8
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA

Post by Black Lab »

Just to confirm, my Resampling is set to Best, and I always set the Compression/Quality to 100.
Post Reply