Rendering trick?

m rixon
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:34 pm

Rendering trick?

Post by m rixon »

We all know how atrocious the rendering times are in Cool 3d.but if your project is say 15 secs, long and just before rendering you reduce the no. of frames to 25 the project is now only 1 sec.long.If you then take your 1 sec. project into Mediastudio and slow the speed to bring the time back to 15 secs.will the quality of the project be seriously reduced?
I saved over 1 hour on a project using this method but cannot yet test the quality on a large sceen TV.On a small monitor it looks ok.
Comments please.
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Post by Ron P. »

Interesting technique..:), however I don't know and will not know unless someone like yourself plays the guinea pig, as I don't have an HD TV. ;)
It would be great if this does prove to work even in HD situations.
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
sjj1805
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
operating_system: Windows XP Pro
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Equium P200-178
processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
ram: 2 GB
Video Card: Intel 945 Express
sound_card: Intel GMA 950
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
Location: Birmingham UK

Post by sjj1805 »

I haven't tried it but I would anticipate a jerky end result.
Without the correct number of 'natural frames' then the Video Editing program would have to invent the missing ones - probably by duplicating existing frames.
I would expect that the more frames that are generated the smoother the end result - ideally 25 fps for PAL | 29.97 fps for NTSC.
daniel
Advisor
Posts: 607
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:08 am
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Post by daniel »

I would vote against it, for the reasons Steve pinpointed.

This would give horrible results except in one single case: a 50% speed of interlaced video. All casual viewers are fooled by this one.

If you want to reduce time either make it smaller in size and zoom in your video editor, it will be less visible; or better reduce the output quality and smoothness of the project in Cool3D.
This my understanding of it.
I have been proven wrong on several occasions in my life. It's not going to improve.
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Post by Ron P. »

This may be easier done with PAL, then NTSC, due to the odd frame rate NTSC uses. I also feel that it would not produce a quality rendering.

However there are alternatives and one such can be found in the following thread: http://phpbb.ulead.com.tw/EN/viewtopic. ... 984#119984
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
m rixon
Posts: 80
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:34 pm

Post by m rixon »

I have had a chance to try it now and unfortunately the results are not very good.I may try the 50% trick next time.
Thanks for the interest shown.