I am just a little surprised by this. In fact, Ulead hates DVD folders, even though it can create them, because it provides no means at all to burn them to disc once you have made them. This is unlike ISO disc image files which in fact VS prefers since it has precisely that extra program you mentioned which will burn them.Whether or not you create a DVD folder is secondary. So far I have not been doing so because Ulead does much like getting them back for burning. As for ISO files Ulead likes them even less and you have to resort to the DVD Image Recorder accessory to burn them
However, that still does not prevent me from nearly always preparing a DVD folder in VS rather than either burning directly to disc or preparing an ISO file, precisely for the reason I stated above.
As for your original question, yes, you might call one or the other une usine à gaz. In English, the expression 'how long is a piece of string?' might be equally appropriate because it all depends on the users unique point of view. I have used every version of VS since VS7. While I quite liked VS9, I much prefer VS10. I still find VS 9 very much slower in just about everything than VS10+, though I acknowledge that for most things the functions are much the same. VS10+ plus, of course, though, has built in native support for things that VS9 required plug-ins for, and also has the extra overlay tracks and all the other bells and whistles. But in fact they are all bells and whistles which I use regularly. And for me, VS10+ is that much faster.
VS11+ is another story. So far, its extra bells for me were supposed to be its ability to work with Vista. But on the other hand, as it has turned out, it doesn't do some of the simple things that even VS7 could do (notably analogue capture). And for our users who have HD cameras, it is causing no end of headaches. So my money remains with VS10+.
