Hi,
I am having serious problems and hoping you all can help. I'm using MSP8.
I have a 8mm tape that I am capturing to DV avi. Based upon the screen of my camcorder during capturing, it appears that is was recorded in 16x9 format.
After I capture it, MSP8 says its a 4x3 fromat. Never the less, after I make my edits and additions of music and stills, I encode it to mpg, DVD 16x9, square pixel rendering, etc., I also use the crop, to crop out the bottom 10 pixels to remove capture garbage. The encoded video seems fine on the PC. However, after I export it to DVD authoring, the file looks bad.
It's hard to describe, its mostly in the movement of the camcorder footage, the pan and zooming. This isn't from a wrong field issue, I have already been through all of that in my previous life.
Outside of what my mistakes have been thus far, can anyone explain to me, how to take this apparent looking 16x9 raw footage and preserve it at 16x9 and also how they would recommend getting rid of the capture garbage at the bottom of the footage?
Thanks and sorry for the long post.
icon123
Capture DV Video to DVD looks bad...
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
-
icon
I doubt it. 16:9 on analogue cams, AFAIK, were always 4:3 with only the centre lines used (letterboxed).
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
-
icon
-
icon
Thanks for the help. I'm not sure that uploading is necessary as of now. I figured out what was causing the problem. When I was using the crop feature during the encoding process, for some reason it is causing the video when authored to a dvd to look distorted, mostly during high movement frames. The weird part is, that the pre authored mpg looks fine and if I don't use the crop feature, it authors fine as well.
What alternative do I have to get rid of this analog garbage at the bottom of the frames instead of using the crop feature? Thanks,
icon
What alternative do I have to get rid of this analog garbage at the bottom of the frames instead of using the crop feature? Thanks,
icon
-
skier-hughes
- Microsoft MVP
- Posts: 2659
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:09 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: gigabyte
- processor: Intel core 2 6420 2.13GHz
- ram: 4GB
- Video Card: NVidia GForce 8500GT
- sound_card: onboard
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 36GB 2TB
- Location: UK
Use (rent/borrow?) a digital8 camcorder that does the 8mm -> digital conversion in the camera (rather than whatever analog capture method you used), and capture via Firewire instead.
If the camera recorded 16:9 on the 8mm (this seems very unusual for an analog camcorder??), but the analog capture you did flagged it as 4:3, you should be able to just change the aspect ratio (w/o "keeping aspect) via stretch etc and maybe the outside parts go away... I'm unclear why stuff at the bottom would be appearing for 4:3 vs 16:9 TVs, since overscan isn't affected by aspect ratio??
I think maybe the crop/zoom you used before converted the field-based video to frame-based (poorly), which caused your motion problems (stuttering?).. which makes sense if it zooms in a few horizontal lines (messing up the interlace).
I agree that a black mask on top of the analog part would be best.
If the camera recorded 16:9 on the 8mm (this seems very unusual for an analog camcorder??), but the analog capture you did flagged it as 4:3, you should be able to just change the aspect ratio (w/o "keeping aspect) via stretch etc and maybe the outside parts go away... I'm unclear why stuff at the bottom would be appearing for 4:3 vs 16:9 TVs, since overscan isn't affected by aspect ratio??
I think maybe the crop/zoom you used before converted the field-based video to frame-based (poorly), which caused your motion problems (stuttering?).. which makes sense if it zooms in a few horizontal lines (messing up the interlace).
I agree that a black mask on top of the analog part would be best.
