I agree that it looks like very heavy compression even if it is not.etech6355 wrote:I can see the small pixels (I think these are the small macro blocks? )
In your version of MF under "Preferences" do you have "BEST" for video re-sampling and encoding or the default of Good.
Under the project settings what did you use for the amount of compression ?
I would think 2 pass encode you would want 100%.
The amount of compression is the amount of motion depth search.
Doesn't look like a good encode, looks similar to if I'd selected 20% compression instead of 100%.
What version of MF are you using anyway?
I have MF 6 and "Best" under Preferences. I rendered the clip in the example with 8000 kbps! (tried both constant and variable (two pass) bit rate, same result).
That's why I am so surprised. I thought at first that I messed up with the settings somehow, but now I think that the compression engine of MF is not so good (compared to Adobe's for example). Unfortunately. Because the Adobe's products cost sooooo/too much. :-/
