OK, so here are couple of results I find "interesting". I use the word "interesting" not "faulty" or "error" or "problem", because the Ulead guys would deny any problems anyway....
All the tests indicate 16:9 settings/environment/output with HI-DEF!
I. - WMV format.
- The clip clearly came out as a 4:3 ratio clip, resolution was OK 1440/1080. (one notebook wasn't able to render Hi-Def WMV files, only a tiny little nothing sized clip...)
- My 'solution': Creating a custom WMV output form using the "Movie Template Manager", and selecting the 16:9 output in it with the same 1440/1080 option. This way the clip rendered as it was supposed to do by itself in the program's available option for WMV Hi-Def!
Why isn't it working correctly and why doesn't it create 16:9 output in 16:9 projects and 16:9 environment by itself? Good question... I, as a simple user, I would think and assume that it would create 16:9 ratio clips in this environment, but it doesn't! So I do consider it an 'interesting thing'. GO AHEAD AND TRY IT!
II. - MPEG format.
- The HD DVD format clips could not be played back on WMP, as everybody says, because of the SD (Standard Definition) codec playing it back. Let's assume for the moment that it is 'normal' and 'acceptable' explanation. You'll see why I agree soon...
- The HDV clip rendered as Hi-Def, does plays back on WMP, though it has the 'TV Stripes' and indicates 1088 instead of 1080. But what I find strange and again, 'interesting' is, that we just agreed that the same Windows Media Player 11 could not play back Hi-Def MPEG-2 clips because it uses SD codec, right??? So, then how on Earth can it play this version back now??? And how is it capable of playing back Hi-Def clips that were created with VS10+ ??? I'm still using the SAME Windows Media Player 11 and yet, suddenly it plays back MPEG-2 Hi-Def files.... Gee, look, a miracle!
So, that's exactly what I would expect from the above HD DVD clip as well, to be able to play it back on Windows Media Player 11, but it doesn't do that!!! It just loves one Hi-Def MPEG-2 file format and hates the other.... Isn't it 'interesting'?...
III. - DivX. This was really funny....
- Output pixel aspect ratio set to NTSC 16:9. The clip was rendered in the 1st video track. The result: a horizontally stretched and badly distorted clip with the hated 'TV Stripes' on top and bottom... in short; it looks stupid!!!
- Output pixel aspect ratio set to NTSC 16:9. The clip was rendered in the 2nd video track. That's right, same clip, same setting, only put into the 2nd video track! The result: A vertically stretched and distorted clip without the 'TV Stripes'. Almost looks nice... almost, but not exactly....
- Output pixel aspect ratio set to SQUARE 1:1. The clip was rendered in the 1st video track. The result: No distortion of any kind, only problem is that the stupid 'TV Stripes' are there, so it can not be played back as a full widescreen, edge-to-edge clip.
- Output pixel aspect ratio set to SQUARE 1:1. The clip was rendered in the 2nd video track. All the same, the clip was just put into 2nd track! The result: Vertically very badly distorted clip.
In short: NONE of them created the result as were supposed to, a nice widescreen edge-to-edge clip without a distortion! NONE!
My solution: Good old 'cutting' in DivX setting and then it finally produced what I wanted, a nice, edge-to-edge widescreen clip without the stupid 'TV stripes'.... but it is an 'imperfect solution, because the resolution comes out as 1440/810, and not 1080, but all considered, I can settle for that...
I know, there will be ton's of explanations for this as well, like for all the other 'interesting' things, but I for one, from the user's point of view, take it as it is, that there is something 'interesting' in this software.
So, here they are, basically NONE of the pre-set options in this program produce the kind of OUTPUT that I expected and took for granted to have at the end. NONE!
With my newly found "wiz" buddy I was able to play back the unplayable clips with bunch of codecs and different players on one of the machines, but then again, he's just one in a million who's got every existing codecs and plug-ins installed, most users don't have that, only their basic player and that's it. And even then, there were examples when the clip info indicated 1088s instead of 1080s. I know, a couple of numbers here and there, who cares, it is 'just a programming thing'...
A very 'interesting' one at that...
