XviD vs DivX

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
brodwidr
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:28 am
operating_system: Windows XP Home
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Dell MoBo 0M3918
processor: Intel Pentium 4 3.00 GHz
ram: 1.5 GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Quadro PCI-E Series
sound_card: built-in
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 75 GB
Location: San Francisco

XviD vs DivX

Post by brodwidr »

Does anyone know if DivX (the $20 codec they sell at the DivX site) gives noticably better results than what we get for free with the bundled-in XviD solution in VS10?

thanks in advance...

- David
VS 10+, windows XP pro SP2, Dell Dimension 4700 P4 3.0 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM, 40GB and 250GB SATA HD, Nvidia Quadro Duo.
etech6355
Posts: 2121
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:24 am
Location: US

Post by etech6355 »

The difference is Xvid is open source software and Divx is commercial software. With Divx you always use their Divx encoder to set the parameters and encode.
With Xvid different programs use graphcial frontends & different methods to create the Xvid video files so quality in one encoder may be better than another. It's hard to comare because depends on the settings, but you can create a great Xvid video file, same as Divx.
For HighDefinition Video Divx would be better.

I bought the latest 6.5 Divx Encoder/Player.
Very satisfied with it. After I create a divx file from VS I usually rename the extension from avi to divx so the divx player is associated with it.

If you want an opinion which is better I prefer Divx.
Also encoding more now in the WMV format so Vista users don't have a problem playing back the videos. Something to consider since Xvid uses mpeg-4 compression which right now is not natively supported in Vista. So I don't think the Vista Media Player will play them back.
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Post by Ken Berry »

I also must say I prefer DivX. I have been a long time owner of successive versions of their Pro and now Bundle versions, and have obtained great results. A couple of years ago I published the results of various tests I did with quality settings. You can contact me if you like and I can send them via email.

A significant number of stand-alone DVD players now natively recognise disc with DivX movies on them -- look for the rating tags on the players. But this is another definite plus. Means people are no long restricted to watching their DivX movies on a computer.

And DivX have taken it one step further by recently producing a full-fledged authoring program (DVD Author) which allows the creation of full menus for DivX discs. This was not possible before. However, a limitation to date is that only a handful of stand-alone players are rated to play these menus back. I am sure this will change rapidly with time, though.
Ken Berry
brodwidr
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:28 am
operating_system: Windows XP Home
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Dell MoBo 0M3918
processor: Intel Pentium 4 3.00 GHz
ram: 1.5 GB
Video Card: NVIDIA Quadro PCI-E Series
sound_card: built-in
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 75 GB
Location: San Francisco

thanks

Post by brodwidr »

Thanks for the feedback, Ken and etech. I'm going to buy that DivX codec and start working with it.
VS 10+, windows XP pro SP2, Dell Dimension 4700 P4 3.0 GHz, 1.5 GB RAM, 40GB and 250GB SATA HD, Nvidia Quadro Duo.
Post Reply