numerical order when inserting stills into timeline
Moderator: Ken Berry
-
brucefl
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:38 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: I7 3770
- processor: 3-4 Gig
- ram: 12gb
- Video Card: NT Geoforce 640
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2 T
- Corel programs: VS21 VS18thru21 and more PIX13
- Location: Millinocket, Maine
numerical order when inserting stills into timeline
When inserting stills for a project, is there a way to set it so they go into the order they are numbered? Seems some never go in right.
I have them numbered so far 1 - 418, when I try it for some reason 421 seems to end up in the first spot?
Actually the files would be 1.jpg thru 421.jpg , I have to recheck the slides, I could of mised a few numbers when saving the pictures.
Last project I did which was far smaller, I had to go 1 then go 1b, 1c and so forth. Any suggestions?
thanks
I have them numbered so far 1 - 418, when I try it for some reason 421 seems to end up in the first spot?
Actually the files would be 1.jpg thru 421.jpg , I have to recheck the slides, I could of mised a few numbers when saving the pictures.
Last project I did which was far smaller, I had to go 1 then go 1b, 1c and so forth. Any suggestions?
thanks
Maybe I misunderstand what you say, but there is a bug in Windows at least up to W2000 when you select a range of files, where the last is first and the first is last, all the others being in right order.
Thus if you select 1-5 you get 5-2-3-4-1.
This is a Windows problem and Ulead can't do anything about it.
Sorry again if you're talking about something else...
Thus if you select 1-5 you get 5-2-3-4-1.
This is a Windows problem and Ulead can't do anything about it.
Sorry again if you're talking about something else...
This my understanding of it.
I have been proven wrong on several occasions in my life. It's not going to improve.
I have been proven wrong on several occasions in my life. It's not going to improve.
I cannot speak to a W2000 problem.daniel wrote:Maybe I misunderstand what you say, but there is a bug in Windows at least up to W2000 when you select a range of files, where the last is first and the first is last, all the others being in right order.
Thus if you select 1-5 you get 5-2-3-4-1.
This is a Windows problem and Ulead can't do anything about it.
Sorry again if you're talking about something else...
But you'll note that "my"
I found this out with Windows 3.1 way back in 1993. Has always worked for me.
bobmo3 has a good system.
When I save currently taken still pictures or video clips on my hard drive I ususally don't make a DVD out of them until the start of a new year. Thus I have a lot of pics to edit and when i do start to edit them I want them in chronological order, that is, from January thru December. Thats my preference. I don't want to do a lot of shuffling in the time line at edit time so when originally saving new pics from camera to the HD I rename each pic or clip thus:
(for pics or clips taken in 2006 for example)
2006a1 2006a2 2006a3 2006b1 2006b2 2006b3
a is the month of January; the a1, a2 and a3 are
sucessive pix taken in January
b is February; b1, b2 and b3 (etc) are sucessive
pix taken in Feb.
and so on
but I can't go past, for example, 2006a9 to rename the next pic 2006a10
because it will put a10 out of order in the folder. However I can use
2006a9a for the next pic and it will stay in order. I can even use 2006a9a1 and that
will stay in order too.
When i finally am ready to import all my pix and clips for the year to VS
for my project I navigate to the folder, highlight the last pic, press shift,
and click on the first pic and they all import in chronological order.
I did find some time ago that if you click on the FIRST clip and then shift
click on the LAST clip, the first and last are juxtaposed when they are placed in VS time line no matter how named.
When I save currently taken still pictures or video clips on my hard drive I ususally don't make a DVD out of them until the start of a new year. Thus I have a lot of pics to edit and when i do start to edit them I want them in chronological order, that is, from January thru December. Thats my preference. I don't want to do a lot of shuffling in the time line at edit time so when originally saving new pics from camera to the HD I rename each pic or clip thus:
(for pics or clips taken in 2006 for example)
2006a1 2006a2 2006a3 2006b1 2006b2 2006b3
a is the month of January; the a1, a2 and a3 are
sucessive pix taken in January
b is February; b1, b2 and b3 (etc) are sucessive
pix taken in Feb.
and so on
but I can't go past, for example, 2006a9 to rename the next pic 2006a10
because it will put a10 out of order in the folder. However I can use
2006a9a for the next pic and it will stay in order. I can even use 2006a9a1 and that
will stay in order too.
When i finally am ready to import all my pix and clips for the year to VS
for my project I navigate to the folder, highlight the last pic, press shift,
and click on the first pic and they all import in chronological order.
I did find some time ago that if you click on the FIRST clip and then shift
click on the LAST clip, the first and last are juxtaposed when they are placed in VS time line no matter how named.
bobmo3 has a good system.
When I save currently taken still pictures or video clips on my hard drive I ususally don't make a DVD out of them until the start of a new year. Thus I have a lot of pics to edit and when i do start to edit them I want them in chronological order, that is, from January thru December. Thats my preference. I don't want to do a lot of shuffling in the time line at edit time so when originally saving new pics from camera to the HD I rename each pic or clip thus:
(for pics or clips taken in 2006 for example)
2006a1 2006a2 2006a3 2006b1 2006b2 2006b3
a is the month of January; the a1, a2 and a3 are
sucessive pix taken in January
b is February; b1, b2 and b3 (etc) are sucessive
pix taken in Feb.
and so on
but I can't go past, for example, 2006a9 to rename the next pic 2006a10
because it will put a10 out of order in the folder. However I can use
2006a9a for the next pic and it will stay in order. I can even use 2006a9a1 and that
will stay in order too.
When i finally am ready to import all my pix and clips for the year to VS
for my project I navigate to the folder, highlight the last pic, press shift,
and click on the first pic and they all import in chronological order.
I did find some time ago that if you click on the FIRST clip and then shift
click on the LAST clip, the first and last are juxtaposed when they are placed in VS time line.
When I save currently taken still pictures or video clips on my hard drive I ususally don't make a DVD out of them until the start of a new year. Thus I have a lot of pics to edit and when i do start to edit them I want them in chronological order, that is, from January thru December. Thats my preference. I don't want to do a lot of shuffling in the time line at edit time so when originally saving new pics from camera to the HD I rename each pic or clip thus:
(for pics or clips taken in 2006 for example)
2006a1 2006a2 2006a3 2006b1 2006b2 2006b3
a is the month of January; the a1, a2 and a3 are
sucessive pix taken in January
b is February; b1, b2 and b3 (etc) are sucessive
pix taken in Feb.
and so on
but I can't go past, for example, 2006a9 to rename the next pic 2006a10
because it will put a10 out of order in the folder. However I can use
2006a9a for the next pic and it will stay in order. I can even use 2006a9a1 and that
will stay in order too.
When i finally am ready to import all my pix and clips for the year to VS
for my project I navigate to the folder, highlight the last pic, press shift,
and click on the first pic and they all import in chronological order.
I did find some time ago that if you click on the FIRST clip and then shift
click on the LAST clip, the first and last are juxtaposed when they are placed in VS time line.
Works for mewhoppke wrote:bobmo3 has a good system.
The "system" requires consistency.whoppke wrote:~~~~but I can't go past, for example, 2006a9 to rename the next pic 2006a10 because it will put a10 out of order in the folder. However I can use 2006a9a for the next pic and it will stay in order. I can even use 2006a9a1 and that will stay in order too.
Continue to use "a" for January, "b' for February, etc.
Determine how many photos you took in any given month.
Then follow my steps noted earlier.
If less than 100, then the "early" images would be 2006a01, 2006a02...
If less than 1000, then the "early" images would be 2006a001, 2006a002..
If less than 10000..you get the idea.
The leading Zeros are essentially fill material for consistency.
Tonight's "homework:" Suppose you have two cameras...
-
sjj1805
- Posts: 14383
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Equium P200-178
- processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
- ram: 2 GB
- Video Card: Intel 945 Express
- sound_card: Intel GMA 950
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
- Location: Birmingham UK
If your'e going to rename several pictures then you may be interested in a freebie:
The Rename
THE Rename is a program designed to help you to rename files and folders en masse with a number of possibilities and options.
This is a freeware program. You can use it in any situation (professional and personal use)
http://www.herve-thouzard.com/modules/w ... rticleid=1
The Rename
THE Rename is a program designed to help you to rename files and folders en masse with a number of possibilities and options.
This is a freeware program. You can use it in any situation (professional and personal use)
http://www.herve-thouzard.com/modules/w ... rticleid=1
I just created a folder that contains the following (21) file names 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg....9.jpg, 10.jpg, 11.jpg....19.jpg, 20.jpg, and 21.jpg. No matter what view I use (details, list, etc) they stay in order. I then imported all 21 images into a project by using Crtl+A to select them all and they all came in 1-21. Just for grins, I changed the Details view to list them 21-1. Using Crtl+A, they all came in in reverse order (21-1).Bobm03 wrote:Your numbering system has to have consistency in the 'number" (sorry) of digits.
If going from 1 to 99, (two digits), use 01,02,03....09, 10...99
If going from 1 to 418 (three digits), use 001, 002, 003,...099, 100....418.
You just have to think like your computer does.
Thad
Using Video Studio Pro X2
-
sjj1805
- Posts: 14383
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
- motherboard: Equium P200-178
- processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
- ram: 2 GB
- Video Card: Intel 945 Express
- sound_card: Intel GMA 950
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
- Location: Birmingham UK
It is good practice to use a numbering system like that mentioned by Bobm03. Some programs sort numbers correctly
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11
Unfortunately some other programs would sort the above sequence as
1-10-11-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9
To save you have to either remember, or test beforehand if the particular program you are working with sorts one way or the other, employ the system of padding out with leading zeros.
01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11
Will always be sorted correctly.
1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11
Unfortunately some other programs would sort the above sequence as
1-10-11-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9
To save you have to either remember, or test beforehand if the particular program you are working with sorts one way or the other, employ the system of padding out with leading zeros.
01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11
Will always be sorted correctly.
-
Trevor Andrew
-
Trevor Andrew
Hi
When using VS 10 use drag and drop.
Search your hard drive for the images and select all.
Drag the first image to the timeline.
Clips will be in order
Ulead support have been informed of the problem, although VS 9 has no problem, i cannot see a fix being made for 10. Bit of a shame.
The problem has been reported in an earlier post, do a search.
Regards
Trevor
When using VS 10 use drag and drop.
Search your hard drive for the images and select all.
Drag the first image to the timeline.
Clips will be in order
Ulead support have been informed of the problem, although VS 9 has no problem, i cannot see a fix being made for 10. Bit of a shame.
The problem has been reported in an earlier post, do a search.
Regards
Trevor

