HDV smartrender problem
-
luc
HDV smartrender problem
I use MSP 8.10 SP1
I edit in HDV PAL
when I use Smartrender when I create an output HDV mpeg file, I notice some slight artefact just after each effect (e.g. after title overlay or after transition effect). The software seems to have problem in joining properly rendered sections and non rendered section.
I have no problem when SmartRender is not ticked, but all my files needs to be recompressed: so it takes longer and the quality is reduced due to the recompression of the native files.
Is this a know problem ?
Thanks !
I edit in HDV PAL
when I use Smartrender when I create an output HDV mpeg file, I notice some slight artefact just after each effect (e.g. after title overlay or after transition effect). The software seems to have problem in joining properly rendered sections and non rendered section.
I have no problem when SmartRender is not ticked, but all my files needs to be recompressed: so it takes longer and the quality is reduced due to the recompression of the native files.
Is this a know problem ?
Thanks !
I experience the same problem when rendering a final video from PALDVD to PALDVD. Even if the source files and final output is the same in properties, I experience the same artefact after transitions, titles, etc.
What would be the solution...
What would be the solution...
Stephan - www.mmponline.co.za
---------
Ulead products:
MSP8, PhotoImpact10, MF4 and 5, Cool 3d Production Studio, Photo Explorer 8.5
---------
Ulead products:
MSP8, PhotoImpact10, MF4 and 5, Cool 3d Production Studio, Photo Explorer 8.5
I'm not qualified to answer, as I don't use HDV but, generally, MPEG is not really an editing format, it's a distribution format. The problem is probably because the artefacts are a result of changes on a P or B frame.
Have you tried converting your raw footage to a no-loss or low-loss format (only I frames), editing and then re-converting to MPEG?
Have you tried converting your raw footage to a no-loss or low-loss format (only I frames), editing and then re-converting to MPEG?
[b][i][color=red]Devil[/color][/i][/b]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
[size=84]P4 Core 2 Duo 2.6 GHz/Elite NVidia NF650iSLIT-A/2 Gb dual channel FSB 1333 MHz/Gainward NVidia 7300/2 x 80 Gb, 1 x 300 Gb, 1 x 200 Gb/DVCAM DRV-1000P drive/ Pan NV-DX1&-DX100/MSP8/WS2/PI11/C3D etc.[/size]
-
Jerry Jones
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:14 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
- Contact:
Re: HDV smartrender problem
Can you describe the artifact?luc wrote:I notice some slight artefact just after each effect (e.g. after title overlay or after transition effect). The software seems to have problem in joining properly rendered sections and non rendered section.
Or can you post a screen shot?
Jerry Jones
http://www.jonesgroup.net
Gateway 7426gx
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
-
Jerry Jones
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:14 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
- Contact:
Also, when you render out your timeline, have you deleted all "temp/preview" files?
I've not done enough HDV editing to be certain, but I suppose it's possible that multiple previews might have a cumulative degradation effect on edit points that might be avoided by clearing the temp/preview files prior to the final render.
Jerry Jones
http://www.jonesgroup.net
I've not done enough HDV editing to be certain, but I suppose it's possible that multiple previews might have a cumulative degradation effect on edit points that might be avoided by clearing the temp/preview files prior to the final render.
Jerry Jones
http://www.jonesgroup.net
Gateway 7426gx
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
-
luc
-
luc
Please find a example of the difference between smart render and not.
It shows an artefact after the crossfade:
using smart render
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... ndered.mpg
not using smart render
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... ndered.mpg
Screenshot of the artefact
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... tefact.jpg
I edit in HDV PAL with MSP 8 SP1
Sony HC1
It shows an artefact after the crossfade:
using smart render
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... ndered.mpg
not using smart render
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... ndered.mpg
Screenshot of the artefact
http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/fa ... tefact.jpg
I edit in HDV PAL with MSP 8 SP1
Sony HC1
-
Jerry Jones
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:14 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
- Contact:
Wow.
That's ugly.
Have you reported that to Ulead technical support?
Form is here:
http://www.ulead.com/tech/techsupport.htm
Jerry Jones
http://www.jonesgroup.net
That's ugly.
Have you reported that to Ulead technical support?
Form is here:
http://www.ulead.com/tech/techsupport.htm
Jerry Jones
http://www.jonesgroup.net
Gateway 7426gx
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
http://tinyurl.com/hagye
-
Sektionschef
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:24 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
Hi
I ran into the same problem with Videostudio10 and the bug still exists in VS11+.
However, I have seen that Ulead has release a V8.2(SP1) update for MSP and in the release notes they mention that problems with smartrendering are solved.
@Luc:
if you still visit this board, did you report the problem to Ulead support at that time and could you please tell me what they answered to you?
@everyone:
Can someone please confirm whether this problem is fixed now or whether it still exists?
Thanks and kind Regards
Sektionschef
I ran into the same problem with Videostudio10 and the bug still exists in VS11+.
However, I have seen that Ulead has release a V8.2(SP1) update for MSP and in the release notes they mention that problems with smartrendering are solved.
@Luc:
if you still visit this board, did you report the problem to Ulead support at that time and could you please tell me what they answered to you?
@everyone:
Can someone please confirm whether this problem is fixed now or whether it still exists?
Thanks and kind Regards
Sektionschef
-
bsuratt
-
Sektionschef
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:24 am
- Location: Vienna, Austria
Thanks, bsurattbsuratt wrote:I have experienced the same problem with NTSC HDV. Not on every transistion, but present on many. About a second after the transistion completes.
Otherwise, MSP8 would do a pretty good job of creating an edited file for MF6 to burn to HD DVD.
Inbetween I could test MSP8.2 on a friends computer and I can tell you:
THE PROBLEM STILL EXISTS IN VERSION 8.2!!!
I have tested with SD-mpeg2 files from my Panasonic SDR-S100 camcorder(no HD) and I could see distortions/glitches at the end of a transition. The problem immediately disappears if I turn off smartrendering. The same problem is in Videostudio11plus. I hope Ulead will fix this terrible bug soon(at least in VS11) otherwise the Ulead products are useless for all HDD or miniDVD camcorder users.
Regards
Sektionschef
-
Jerry Jones
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:14 pm
- Location: Boise, Idaho, USA
- Contact:
-
G-Davies
HDV
The problem lies with MSP and all the Windows XP (32/64 versions) which do not handle Mpeg HDV correctly or any high quality media for that matter. Solution is XXXX Express which allows very good frame editing for HDV when used with the correct hardware. Vista is leaps ahead of XP which handles HDV video almost perfectly so when the competition are up to speed with Vista the OS should hopefully be a match for the Mac, which all professional programs are available for.
Vista 64 bit programs are starting to appear and the improvement is very noticeable and a step closer to the Mac OS. If I¡¦m right in thinking stands at only two or three if you count the current Intel OS platform. I have lost count of all the windows versions so far and still pulling my hair out even with OEM equipment. My seven year old Powerbook G3 still holds its own against Vista only having to do one install upgrade for each OS for a dual boot system that¡¦s the benefits of a hardware software manufacturer, it does exactly what it says on the box.
Vista 64 bit programs are starting to appear and the improvement is very noticeable and a step closer to the Mac OS. If I¡¦m right in thinking stands at only two or three if you count the current Intel OS platform. I have lost count of all the windows versions so far and still pulling my hair out even with OEM equipment. My seven year old Powerbook G3 still holds its own against Vista only having to do one install upgrade for each OS for a dual boot system that¡¦s the benefits of a hardware software manufacturer, it does exactly what it says on the box.
