Whats the difference between constant & variable.

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
roy wood
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Norwich,Norfolk.U.K>

Whats the difference between constant & variable.

Post by roy wood »

Hi all, what difference does it make in visual terms between a Bitrate set at 8000kbps Variable and 8000kbps Constant.

Also what are the Visual differences between the Quality slider being set at 70% or 100% in Share/ Create Vid File/ Compression. Does it make the Video Sharper,Steadier,Smoother or what? Please.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
2Dogs
Advisor
Posts: 1152
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:33 am
Location: Katrinaland

Re: Whats the difference between constant & variable.

Post by 2Dogs »

roy wood wrote:Hi all, what difference does it make in visual terms between a Bitrate set at 8000kbps Variable and 8000kbps Constant.
I trust you are not an aging glam-rocker! :lol:

It's almost the wrong question. Variable bitrate will use higher compression and therefore lower bitrate on parts of the video that don't change much - it's really noticeable if you make up a slideshow, where using variable bitrate will make the finished file size much smaller. So you might have asked "what difference does it make in visual terms between a Bitrate set at 9000kbps Variable and 8000kbps Constant?"

You can then use that two ways - you can fit more footage on a DVD, or you can use a higher maximum bitrate, to improve the image quality a bit. Since the DVD standard limits the maximum bitrate, however, for most videos around one hour long (for a single layer DVD) you won't see much difference in image quality between a DVD made with constant bitrate and one with variable.

The big downside with variable bitrate is that it's best to use two pass encoding, which takes almost twice as long.
JVC GR-DV3000u Panasonic FZ8 VS 7SE Basic - X2
roy wood
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Norwich,Norfolk.U.K>

Post by roy wood »

Thanks for your replies guys. So if I've got a lot of movement or stills use fixed bitrate otherwise not a lot of difference. Regards Roy.
2Dogs
Advisor
Posts: 1152
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 3:33 am
Location: Katrinaland

Post by 2Dogs »

roy wood wrote:So if I've got a lot of movement or stills use fixed bitrate otherwise not a lot of difference. Regards Roy.
Actually the reverse! If you have lots of movement and/or stills, use the highest variable bitrate you can - but you'll only see any significant benefit if your project is long enough to limit the maximum constant bitrate, and of course the render time is roughly doubled for two-pass variable bitrate encoding.

For example, assume you have a 90 minute project, with lots of stills. Using constant bitrate (and a single layer disk) you might be limited to a maximum of 6000 kbps to be able to fit it onto the disk.

Choosing variable bitrate might allow you to use 8500 kbps. You should be able to detect a discernible difference in image quality between 6000 kbps CBR and 8500 kbps VBR.

Most of the time it's easier and quicker to just go for CBR.
JVC GR-DV3000u Panasonic FZ8 VS 7SE Basic - X2
roy wood
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Norwich,Norfolk.U.K>

Post by roy wood »

Thanks for coming back on that 2Dogs. I think I've just about got my head around it still 'You don't have to be an electrician to turn on the lights just now where the switch is' Thanks again Roy.
Post Reply