Support for AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core

Moderator: Ken Berry

Post Reply
Kaledi
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:32 pm

Support for AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core

Post by Kaledi »

Ok I've been monitoring the other thread on VS10Plus support for Core 2 Duo and the software making use of both CPUs when encoding video.

At first I thought that the SP1 update also provided dual-core support for AMD dual core processors. Now I'm not so convinced since my processor never gets above approximately 65% when rendering - this is also true in MF5Plus, which is also supposed to support dual-core processors.

So you AMD users out there, can you confirm whether or not you think VS10+ now makes use of both cores or not? Unfortunately, I did not do any benchmark before updating to SP1

I use an AMD X2 4600 for reference
htchien
Advisor
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:10 pm
operating_system: Mac
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Contact:

Post by htchien »

Sometimes the bottleneck is not how software uses the CPU resources. It's possible CPU is waiting for disk I/O activities.

Just my 2 cents.

H.T.
Ted (H.T.)

[color=red]The message is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights. For official tech support please contact Corel Tech Support.[/color]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/htchien]My YouTube channel[/url]
Kaledi
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:32 pm

Post by Kaledi »

HT thanks for your input and quite agree with you, but in this instance I've just put a new system together, which consists of the X2 processor, 2 GB of DDR2 cas4 RAM, 1x 74GB 10K RPM (RAPTOR) HDD, 320 GB 7200RPM SATA and 400 GB 7200RPM SATA drives. I'm making full use of all 3 drives in VS10

I/O transfers are very fast even in VS10 (e.g. SmartRender)

What concerns me is that other software that are multi-thread capable such as Adobe Lightroom (beta) or Nero Recode (only time I mention it), will completely max out both CPUs on my machine, which VS10 and MF5 do not even during rendering MPEG. Indeed MF5 does not go above 50%, which suggests to me that it is only using one core, while VS10 uses between 60 and 72%.

I wanted to get to know other AMD X2 user experiences with VS10 because what concerns me is that either (1) my machine may have a bug, or (2) the MPEG encoder itself is not optimised for AMD dual-core processors and if this is the case then I'm sure that there are many users out there who would like AMD processors to be supported in future updates and not just those that Intel offer.
Terry Stetler
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Westland, Michigan USA

Post by Terry Stetler »

I get about 74%, so yours appears to be in the right range.

Remember that not all encoders are fully multithreaded or that only certain modes (ex: 2-pass) may be affected.

That said; nothing stops you from using the encoder of your choosing. Just download the freeware DebugMode Frameserver.

http://www.debugmode.com/frameserver/

It adds a new export filetype which saves a proxy "avi" file. This file is actually used to link MSPro or VideoStudio's timeline to external encoders as if they were a Ulead plugin. Just load it into the encoder.

Once the link is made you set up the encoder and start it. The frameserver handles it from there.

The only problem you may have is Frameservers installer; you may have to browse to VS's VIO folder manually.
Terry Stetler
Post Reply