preview screen brightness VS10

Moderator: Ken Berry

somegeek

Post by somegeek »

Sorry for the rant...but this stuff gets old...
No older than the amount of time many of us have wasted rebooting, reinstalling, looking for solutions and basically NOT making movies. If a product can't deliver on its promises, regardless of price, it has no business being on the market.[/quote]

Who can argue with that?

I've hit the wall again with trying to get Video Studio 10 Plus to capture from my Sony HC3 camera.

Purchased and downloaded VideoStudio 10 Plus. Performed a clean install - won't capture from my Sony HC3 camera. Installed the Service Pack for VS, still won't capture.

Recognizes my camera is attached - I can control it - but capture is not functioning.

somegeek
TDK1044
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:35 pm
Location: USA

Post by TDK1044 »

Video Studio is now, and has always been, an entry level editing tool. Ulead will be the first to tell you that. Whatever Cycle Writer says, you're not going to get a $90 piece of software that excels in all three functions of capture, edit and burn. In my opinion, video studio edits and renders very well, and captures and burns competently....most of the time.

Most of the issues I see in this forum deal with education of the user and not a functionality problem with the software. Of course there are bugs and glitches. Try using the pro version of Avid for a week and see how often it crashes on you!

Video Studio software is designed for uncle Jim to shoot his family with his video camera and then cut out the shots of the sky and people's feet. The fact that it's possible to do so much more than that with it is a bonus.

There are semi pro and professional software packages out there for the folks who really want to play at being Steven Spielberg; Video Studio isn't it.
Terry
CycleWriter
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:25 pm

Post by CycleWriter »

TDK1044 wrote:Video Studio is now, and has always been, an entry level editing tool. Ulead will be the first to tell you that. Whatever Cycle Writer says, you're not going to get a $90 piece of software that excels in all three functions of capture, edit and burn.
Again, another mischaracterization of what I'm saying. You're right, I don't expect it to "excel" at anything at that price point. That's what high-end editing software is supposed to do and do reliably, which is what justifies the higher cost. I merely want Ulead to fix the many operational problems with the software and quit throwing more features at a dysfunctional product until it does.
In my opinion, video studio edits and renders very well, and captures and burns competently....most of the time.
So what you're saying is that the level of incompetence is commensurate with the purchase price? I'm sorry, but I just don't buy into that defeatist thinking.
Most of the issues I see in this forum deal with education of the user and not a functionality problem with the software. Of course there are bugs and glitches. Try using the pro version of Avid for a week and see how often it crashes on you!
Granted, video editing by its very nature is not an easy task for the uninitiated. But VS (and programs like it) go out of their way playing up their ease of use in their marketing efforts. You can't trade on that claim and then not deliver.
Video Studio software is designed for uncle Jim to shoot his family with his video camera and then cut out the shots of the sky and people's feet. The fact that it's possible to do so much more than that with it is a bonus.

There are semi pro and professional software packages out there for the folks who really want to play at being Steven Spielberg; Video Studio isn't it.
Trust me, I'm no Spielberg. What I've been trying to do for the past two weeks with VS is identical to what the majority of people who buy VS try to do: Capture video from a DV camcorder, capture video from an analog source (in my case, a VCR to convert VHS to DVD), and simple editing tasks. All my hardware is compliant, I have all the proper codecs and I have a fairly high-end computer and some previous video editing skill. Yet here I am scanning message groups looking for solutions or workarounds to overcome problems with these basic tasks. And discovering that once Ulead has your money, they don't really care about you as a customer. They're too busy working up the next version's feature set to entice new customers to buy the product. It's almost the equivalent of a Ponzi scheme.
tel33

Sucess!!!!

Post by tel33 »

Sucess! It was the driver that was causing the problem and now my dispaly is clear and bright again.

I finally reverted back to an older one and hey presto it worked, when I now play the clips back in edit mode the playback is perfect.

For anyone with a NVIDIA Geforce graphics card the latest driver on the NVIDIA website is a bit problematic.

The driver I am using is dated 01/04/2005 Version 71.89

Uninstall the old driver through ADD/REMOVE PROGRAMS restart the pc and install the older driver, it worked for me so it may work for you too.

I will try a later driver to see if its jsut the most recent that is causing the problem.

Good luck

Ady
Last edited by tel33 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Post by Ken Berry »

As a matter of interest, what was the latest driver number you used. I have only last week installed version 91.47. Since then, one or two strange things have occurred which made me wonder about the driver...
Ken Berry
TDK1044
Posts: 448
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:35 pm
Location: USA

Post by TDK1044 »

All I can say to you, Cycle Writer, is that you must be very unlucky with Video Studio. I've been using the product since VS6, and the only problem I've experienced (not fixed by patches) is the fact that Ulead never got Smart Render to work correctly relative to MPEG2. My solution to that is to simply not use 'Smart Render'. Should that function work correctly? Absolutely, and there are those on the forum who'll tell you that it works for them. It has never worked for me....at least not properly

In conclusion, I don't think you and I are miles apart in what we're saying, but I think our perspective is different. I want any product I purchase to work the way the user manual says it should, and in terms of the way I use video studio, it does. You obviously have had a very different experience with the product. What I don't undersatnd is why you keep buying it? If I had experienced your isues with Video Studio, I'd have dumped it long agao?
Terry
tel33

Post by tel33 »

The driver I used that was screwing my preview picture up was version 91.47, the one that is on the main Nvidia site now if that is any help to you.

I will be trying the later drivers to see if it effects the preview playback also.

Cheers

Ady
Last edited by tel33 on Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
tel33

Post by tel33 »

Forgot to say the older driver that works and is mentioned in my posts above was supposed to say version 71.89 but I put a full stop in by accident!

Just found the edit button for the post above so this post is not valid anymore, please remove.

Thanks
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Post by Ken Berry »

Yes. I had previously been using 71.89 myself and luckily, still have the downloaded file on my computer. Version 91.47 has been causing my monitor to blink on and off repeatedly on certain occasions (requiring a hard reboot), and also an inability to deal with competing graphics-related demands. So I think I too will be rolling back to the earlier version. After all, the latest updates only relate to new NVidia-based cards which came much later than my own Card! :cry:
Ken Berry
tel33

Post by tel33 »

Looking at the systems of most of the people posting on this topic it seems as though this effects mainly Nvidia systems so maybe Ulead need to contact them to get it sorted, are you listening Ulead? :wink: :?:

Update 03 Oct 06

I have now tried a later driver, version 91.31 (June 23 2006) and there appears to be no issues with the preview playback at all so I am going to stick with this one for the time being and see how it goes.

Cheers all

Ady
CycleWriter
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 11:25 pm

Post by CycleWriter »

TDK1044 wrote:All I can say to you, Cycle Writer, is that you must be very unlucky with Video Studio. I've been using the product since VS6, and the only problem I've experienced (not fixed by patches) is the fact that Ulead never got Smart Render to work correctly relative to MPEG2.
I've been using it since Ver. 4 and have always had some operational feature that needed either a workaround or abandonment.
You obviously have had a very different experience with the product. What I don't undersatnd is why you keep buying it? If I had experienced your isues with Video Studio, I'd have dumped it long agao?
I have several other video editing programs as I have yet to find one that serves all purposes. Rather, there always seems to be something that one of the other programs does better or easier. I choose which one I'll use based on the complexity of the project. One of the main things I HATE about VS is the inability to custom name capture files. When dealing with multiple captures this becomes a major pain and for the life of me I don't know why it has persisted all the way to Ver. 10. To answer your question, I do a lot of video with no source sound. I have a lot of money invested in SmartSounds libraries and they make it so easy to add royalty-free music tracks to these videos without copyright concerns. No other program beyond Pinnacle Studio uses SmartSounds and I will NEVER buy another Pinnacle product again so I'm stuck with VS in that regard. Believe me, no one wants VS to work properly more than I do. I'm just frustrated with seing version after version get more complex with things that are aimed at more professional level editing while problems with simple tasks, like capturing, continue. A sub-$100 editor has no business trying to tackle HD video until it can reliably work with standard video, and VS ain't there yet. :wink:
User avatar
Ken Berry
Site Admin
Posts: 22481
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:36 pm
operating_system: Windows 11
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC
processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ram: 32 GB DDR4
Video Card: AMD RX 6600 XT
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB SSD + 2 TB HDD
Monitor/Display Make & Model: Kogan 32" 4K 3840 x 2160
Corel programs: VS2022; PSP2023; DRAW2021; Painter 2022
Location: Levin, New Zealand

Post by Ken Berry »

If you look at the SmartSounds website, you will see there is now a plug-in for Adobe Premiere Pro too (don't know if it will also work with Premiere Elements).

And if you have already invested in a significant SmartSound library -- and I agree that at US$100 a disc, any purchase is a major investment! :cry: -- then you might want to consider actually buying their main program, Sonic Fire Pro. With that, you can tailor the SmartSound tracks exactly to your video as you can play your video in SonicFire's monitor screen. Then you export the trimmed music (I do it in vanilla flavour .wav), and insert it in any video editing package you like... :lol:
Ken Berry
Post Reply