Moderators, would you kindly remove the offensively sized avatar for user(s) Universal_Pictures/Paramount_Pictures?
It's not even as if it's an actual photo of the guy, but has been stolen from handbag.com, in contravention of their copyright.
He's already been given advice on how to change it for himself (see thread 'difference'), but has chosen to ignore it.
Thanks for your moderation!
Appeal to moderators: please remove offensive avatar
Appeal to moderators: please remove offensive avatar
Last edited by Velojet on Fri Sep 08, 2006 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We don't actually have the ability to do that. We only can edit, delete, and lock posts.
I don't know, but I suspect that his Paramount_Pictures account was shut-down by an administrator. So, now we have Universal_Pictures.
I don't know, but I suspect that his Paramount_Pictures account was shut-down by an administrator. So, now we have Universal_Pictures.
[size=92][i]Head over heels,
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
No time to think.
It's like the whole world's
Out of... sync.[/i]
- Head Over Heels, The Go-Gos.[/size]
In that case, could you please ask an administrator to shut down his Universal_Pictures account - otherwise (apart from anything else) I'd think that Ulead could be liable for the breach of copyright.DVDDoug wrote:We don't actually have the ability to do that ... I suspect that his Paramount_Pictures account was shut-down by an administrator. So, now we have Universal_Pictures.
Well, yes, it's now closer (99x124) to the allowed max size ("width can be no greater than 80 pixels, the height no greater than 80 pixels") but it's still in breach of copyright: "Celebrity images appearing on handbag.com cannot be reproduced elsewhere."DVDDoug wrote:Wow! He fixed it!
But thanks for weighing in, DVDDoug.