M$ cripples Vista 32 bit: NO HD PLAYBACK

Discuss anything about video editing, HD, codecs, etc......
Post Reply
Terry Stetler
Posts: 973
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Westland, Michigan USA

M$ cripples Vista 32 bit: NO HD PLAYBACK

Post by Terry Stetler »

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3922

Microsoft has announced that they have bent to studio pressure and denied users HD playback with Vista 32 bit/32 bit processors. M$ will require everyone wanting to play Blue-ray, HD-DVD etc. to have:

Vista 64
64-bit processor
all drivers must be WHQL certified

BUY, BUY, BUY......get less, less, less
Terry Stetler
heinz-oz

Re: M$ cripples Vista 32 bit: NO HD PLAYBACK

Post by heinz-oz »

Terry Stetler wrote:http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3922

Microsoft has announced that they have bent to studio pressure and denied users HD playback with Vista 32 bit/32 bit processors. M$ will require everyone wanting to play Blue-ray, HD-DVD etc. to have:

Vista 64
64-bit processor
all drivers must be WHQL certified

BUY, BUY, BUY......get less, less, less
I'd say, get STUFFED, STUFFED, STUFFED, sorry :oops:
sjj1805
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
operating_system: Windows XP Pro
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Equium P200-178
processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
ram: 2 GB
Video Card: Intel 945 Express
sound_card: Intel GMA 950
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
Location: Birmingham UK

Post by sjj1805 »

I signed up and obtained a copy of the Beta Version.
It took 4 hours to do an upgrade install on one of my spare hard drives containing XP Pro.

I then found half the hardware didn't want to work with it - this is hardware that quite happily works with XP Pro. so it appears we would end up doing what we were forced to do when XP replaced 98 (Forget the white elephant Windows ME) and go out and buy a load of new compatible hardware.

After boot up and waiting for the computer to settle down it was using 500 MB of RAM in its "idle state." which is more RAM than several of my friends have installed - so there is another 'Upgrade.'

I haven't even started with things like processor power, video cards and so on.

Until I am forced to upgrade (Micro$oft recently announced they no longer support Windows 98 ) then I shall be sticking with XP. It does everything that I ask of it.
BrownKnows

Hmmm, sounds familiar

Post by BrownKnows »

Kinda sounds like the MediaStudio Pro upgrade from 7 to 8. Pay (lots) more money to get the product without CG Infinity and Video Paint. Want those? Pay more.
User avatar
Ron P.
Advisor
Posts: 12002
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:45 am
operating_system: Windows 10
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Hewlett-Packard 2AF3 1.0
processor: 3.40 gigahertz Intel Core i7-4770
ram: 16GB
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645
sound_card: NVIDIA High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: 1-HP 27" IPS, 1-Sanyo 21" TV/Monitor
Corel programs: VS5,8.9,10-X5,PSP9-X8,CDGS-9,X4,Painter
Location: Kansas, USA

Post by Ron P. »

If you look at the price of MSP 7 (if I recall it was around $299 upgrade) that had both, and then look at the price of MSP8 $199, I don't really think you are paying more. I think Ulead removed it, giving people the option to have a prosumer product that didn't want or use CG Infinity or Video Paint. For those that do, then just $29 more. In my opinion that's not unrealistic..
Ron Petersen, Web Board Administrator
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

That article is full of holes. I wonder if he still has a job with MS.
.
Post Reply