Advice regarding LCD monitor

Discuss anything about video editing, HD, codecs, etc......
Post Reply
Greg
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: South Africa

Advice regarding LCD monitor

Post by Greg »

What should I be looking at, specification wise? ie response time etc. Used mainly for MSP and related apps.
Any advice appreciated.

Regards,
Greg
sjj1805
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
operating_system: Windows XP Pro
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Equium P200-178
processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
ram: 2 GB
Video Card: Intel 945 Express
sound_card: Intel GMA 950
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
Location: Birmingham UK

Post by sjj1805 »

Larger the better. Thats about all there is to it.
heinz-oz

Post by heinz-oz »

I beg to differ here Steve. When it comes to LCD, refresh time is very important. Take one with the shortest refresh time you can afford. Video on LCD monitors does not look very good if the refresh time is above 8ms. CRT monitors are a lot better for video display. That's why I still use a bulky 20" CRT monitor for my video editing system.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

Even though I have LCD's that are 8ms or less I think the CRT's I have looked better for the video motion and all.

The LCD's are much easier on my eyes though in the long run. That's why I switched and also for more desktop space.

For the poster I would start at the ViewSonic website and read the difference between the models, consumer/intermediate/pro.
They all can go bad or have defects along with bad pixels. So check the warranties & return policies. Especially about bad pixels or black dots on the monitor lcd screen. Some companies will tell you that is normal and a return may have to have "X" amount of bad pixels before they will replace it.
htchien
Advisor
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:10 pm
operating_system: Mac
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Contact:

Post by htchien »

maddrummer3301 wrote:Some companies will tell you that is normal and a return may have to have "X" amount of bad pixels before they will replace it.
Most of the time the X is less than 5. If you see 5 or more bad pixels on a LCD panel, you might be qualified to get the LCD replaced.

I personally use Philips 15 inch LCD at home for 4 years and Philips 17 inch LCD in office for 1 year but I might switch to ViewSonic or Mozo as my next wide-screen LCD monitor.

Heinz is right, the response time is very important for LCDs, especially if you want to use the LCD for video editing or gaming. 8ms or less would be suggested. Also the contrast of the LCD is important, too. Choose a brighter one.

H.T.
Ted (H.T.)

[color=red]The message is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights. For official tech support please contact Corel Tech Support.[/color]

[url=http://www.youtube.com/htchien]My YouTube channel[/url]
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

I've been using the 19" ViewSonic's
VA912b (Dual-Head)
VP920b (Single-Head on another machine).
They are Bright & Clear for computer work. Average settings for contrast & brightness is 70%.

One of the VA912b that was a special from buy.com has a small smear, it's not always visible unless using a bright background, but annoying enough. Appears more like the front masking is pressing on the internal screen. It's wasn't easy to return or exchange it since past the 90days from the distributor.
Never tried ViewSonic company to exchange.
Even though they have the same model numbers the specs are different and the newer one has a higher refresh rate although I push it back to 60 (US).
All of them display the video very well. My 21' CRT's simply eat up the desktop and are rough on my eyes.

MD
Greg
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: South Africa

Post by Greg »

Thanks for the feedback, guys.

Regards,
Greg
Post Reply