My DVD's are appearing as if deinterlaced

Post Reply
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

My DVD's are appearing as if deinterlaced

Post by Scooterspal »

This one has me stumped. I recently upgraded to version 5. Up til now I have only used it to import existing DVD's and reburn. No problems... they come out perfect and look like 30I video.

Yesterday I took a freshly captured DV camera file and attempted to make a DVD. The end result looked as if it was deinterlaced on the TV. I made several tests with older DV files and the same end result. Looks like deinterlaced video at 30P.

I'm working at the HQ setting, 7000kbs, dolby audio. The basic preset for HQ. No changes.

Thought is was the MainConcept DV codec I use but even Microsoft DV codec files do the same thing. Very strange. I see nothing in the MF5 set up that accounts for the deinterlacing.

Any thougths?

Windows 2000, SP4, 1ghz system. Premiere 6.5 to capture/edit. Movie Factory 5
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by Scooterspal »

So what are you saying? This is a known issue and we are supposed to accept it?
sjj1805
Posts: 14383
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 7:20 am
operating_system: Windows XP Pro
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: Equium P200-178
processor: Intel Pentium Dual-Core Processor T2080
ram: 2 GB
Video Card: Intel 945 Express
sound_card: Intel GMA 950
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1160 GB
Location: Birmingham UK

Post by sjj1805 »

It is looking like there might be a fault. Could I ask if anyone else is experiencing this problem to place few details here so that we can collate the information with a view to investigating if there is a need to ask Ulead Tech to explore the problem.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by Scooterspal »

Sorry if I sounded like a snot. Just miffed I guess.

I have MF3 on another system (along with 5) so I will try the same file on that system using each version to see what happens.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by Scooterspal »

I just tried a DV clip using MF3 and I got what looks like displaced jittering progressive scan... the odd and even fields being reversed and the audio way out of sync.

Now I've used 3 before many times with DV video and it worked perfectly. Something has happened to 3 since I installed 5 on that system.

Trying the same clip in 5 I still get the progressive scan or deinterlaced looking video and I did try using the 2-pass encode this time.

It appears that installing 5 corrupted the encoding engine for 3 if that's even possible. Assumed they would be in separate folders much like my 2 versions of Premiere. Guess not.
Last edited by Scooterspal on Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by Scooterspal »

I'm not getting any of what your saying. What Export Icon? Do you mean Project Settings?

If I go there and select Customize all is marked as it should be... 720x480.

What do you mean by "will encode LFF"
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Last edited by maddrummer3301 on Sat Feb 03, 2007 6:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Scooterspal
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by Scooterspal »

Yes, I see that. I had the options hidden. Never needed to use it but checking under "customize" all is marked correctly and I still get a bad result.
maddrummer3301
Posts: 2507
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:24 pm
Location: US

Post by maddrummer3301 »

.
Post Reply