Why to stop there? get right to 16K
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16K_resolution
with very quick rendering of course.
Can you upload 5sec of your 5K so we can test it?
Moderator: Ken Berry
Why to stop there? get right to 16K
See examples at: https://app.sugarsync.com/wf/D1814182_09132603_003789asik1 wrote: Can you upload 5sec of your 5K so we can test it?
It's very demanding clip at ~150Mb/spepegota wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 5:27 pmSee examples at: https://app.sugarsync.com/wf/D1814182_09132603_003789asik1 wrote: Can you upload 5sec of your 5K so we can test it?
Input file was what Power Director first saw. The Output was the best it could do.
VS cannot accept the Input file. The ability to accept 8k as input is around the corner. Presently, there is no consumer 360 camera that can support 8k only pro cameras, but it is coming. Therefore, the need to accept 360 8k video, as input, will be required and it will be outputted at 4k. I don't think I will be aound to see the advent of consumer 8k TVs, but that day may come. The videos were made with an Insta360 One RS camera.
But does Davinci Resolve 17 (free version) also have the ability to set 6K resolution, if not A$469 is a lot to pay for the Studio version,rwernyei wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 7:12 pm DaVinci Resolve 17 Studio had no problems with the Input clip. I set the timeline to 6016x2560 resolution and the Delivery page to CBR 150000 Kb/s to match 150 Mb/s and added stabilization too.
I set the download availability for a week.
https://rwernyei.filemail.com/d/bwhjjcnrkuobbwq