Alternative B&W Processing
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Alternative B&W Processing
I use ASP (have not yet upgraded to ASP2) but will in the near future for most of my PP needs.
Currently, I am working with black and white images and am wondering if there is a better alternative than ASP? I have heard Light Zone or Dark Table may be better for working with monochrome?
Anyone using these programs care to comment? Or, are there other alternatives for developing better black and white images?
BTW, I am using a Mac with Maverick as the OS.
Thanks!
GR
Currently, I am working with black and white images and am wondering if there is a better alternative than ASP? I have heard Light Zone or Dark Table may be better for working with monochrome?
Anyone using these programs care to comment? Or, are there other alternatives for developing better black and white images?
BTW, I am using a Mac with Maverick as the OS.
Thanks!
GR
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 7:14 am
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: MSI P67A-GD65 B3
- processor: Intel Core i7
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: MSI GeForce GTX 460 Hawk 1024 MB
- sound_card: on-board
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Eizo EV-2333W
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
When your camera body is supported you could try DxO with their filmpack.
Their film-look, be it B&W or color film, is IMO the best there is with the least amount of "user input", dragging sliders etc.
Once you have found your favorite "look" store it in a preset and apply that as a starting point to your other images.
It is my number 1 raw processor for 10 years now, I only use ASP for those occasions where I need layers or some local edits.
Their film-look, be it B&W or color film, is IMO the best there is with the least amount of "user input", dragging sliders etc.
Once you have found your favorite "look" store it in a preset and apply that as a starting point to your other images.
It is my number 1 raw processor for 10 years now, I only use ASP for those occasions where I need layers or some local edits.
Enjoy!
Herman.
Herman.
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:49 am
- System_Drive: Z
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUSTeK P8H77-I
- processor: Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5 GHz x 8
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
- sound_card: Radeon HD 7700 7800 Sapphire
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2x250GbSSD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: LG IPS 21:9 UltraWide 34UM95-P 3440x1440
- Corel programs: AfterShotPro 1, 2, (3)
- Location: Austria
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
you tried all B&W Plugins?
http://www.aftershotpro.com/de/plugins/ ... html#tab=3
http://www.aftershotpro.com/de/plugins/ ... html#tab=3
regards Hannes
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Thanks, I will check it out.herman wrote:When your camera body is supported you could try DxO with their filmpack.
Their film-look, be it B&W or color film, is IMO the best there is with the least amount of "user input", dragging sliders etc.
Once you have found your favorite "look" store it in a preset and apply that as a starting point to your other images.
It is my number 1 raw processor for 10 years now, I only use ASP for those occasions where I need layers or some local edits.
GR
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
hannes_hab wrote:you tried all B&W Plugins?
http://www.aftershotpro.com/de/plugins/ ... html#tab=3
Yes, I have tried some of them for ASP; however, if I upgrade to ASP2 most are not yet available.
-
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 4:49 am
- System_Drive: Z
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUSTeK P8H77-I
- processor: Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5 GHz x 8
- ram: 16 GB
- Video Card: AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
- sound_card: Radeon HD 7700 7800 Sapphire
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 2x250GbSSD
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: LG IPS 21:9 UltraWide 34UM95-P 3440x1440
- Corel programs: AfterShotPro 1, 2, (3)
- Location: Austria
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
all plugins work with the 32bit version of ASP2
(all except "Texa" as far as I know)
see also:
http://forum.corel.com/EN/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=53597
(all except "Texa" as far as I know)
see also:
http://forum.corel.com/EN/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=53597
regards Hannes
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)
austria
Nikon D7000 + D70, Nikon P6000, Nikon P330 (use P7800) PanasonicTZ100, Vuescan
bibble 4, bibble 5, ASP mostly on Ubuntu 14.04 ( sometimes Suse Linux 11.4 or WIN10)
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:57 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASRock Z77
- processor: Intel i7 quad core
- ram: 32 GB
- Video Card: saphire hd 5450 2xdvi
- sound_card: on board
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 4TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Eizo S2410W & S2431W, calibrated with i1d2
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
I moved to darktable (in general, not only for b&w), which provide several ways for b&w processing.grcolts wrote:I have heard Light Zone or Dark Table may be better for working with monochrome?
In case you don't just want to pull down the saturation, you can use for example the following modules: channel mixer, color areas, monochrome.
It depends on the image, which way works best. Give it a try.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- Video Card: FirePro 4900
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
- Location: München
- Contact:
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Nostalgia still works in 32bit AS2.
Much cheaper than DxO and other commercial packages with easily the same results.
And for quick work on an already adjusted color image, nothing beats Silikon Bonk (the name describes it already, it is Bernd's professional experience put into silicone).
Having said that, I also use the LR color adjustments in BW with a bit of clarity and contrast to achieve nice results. The more I work with digital BW, the less rely on plugins.
cheers
afx
Much cheaper than DxO and other commercial packages with easily the same results.
And for quick work on an already adjusted color image, nothing beats Silikon Bonk (the name describes it already, it is Bernd's professional experience put into silicone).
Having said that, I also use the LR color adjustments in BW with a bit of clarity and contrast to achieve nice results. The more I work with digital BW, the less rely on plugins.
cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 9:53 pm
- System_Drive: C
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- motherboard: ASUS A78M-A
- processor: AMD A8 6600K
- ram: 8 GB
- Video Card: ASUS R7 250X
- sound_card: AMD High Definition
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1 TB
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: Dell
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Check out Topaz B&W Effects.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
hannes_hab wrote:all plugins work with the 32bit version of ASP2
(all except "Texa" as far as I know)
see also:
http://forum.corel.com/EN/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=53597
Question, if one purchases the 32bit version of ASP2, can you later freely switch to 64 bit when more plug-ins become available?
GR
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Ok, I did download DarkTable and am now trying to figure it out.TheDude wrote:I moved to darktable (in general, not only for b&w), which provide several ways for b&w processing.grcolts wrote:I have heard Light Zone or Dark Table may be better for working with monochrome?
In case you don't just want to pull down the saturation, you can use for example the following modules: channel mixer, color areas, monochrome.
It depends on the image, which way works best. Give it a try.
It is not as difficult to use as I have heard others say it is. The layout is familiar to me, there are just lots of options in modules that is going to take some time to learn. However, I see the basic modules are pretty easy to find and put to use. I am really surprised at how much Dark Table offers for free. And, it is fast on my Mac; almost as fast as ASP. The Lightroom images seem to me to have a glitch when scrolling through them, it becomes jittery. I hope to test out its black and white capabilities soon.
Comparing it to ASP, ASP does have quicker access to controls, plus it has a slide view program I use a lot, whereas Dark Table does not seem to offer this feature. Certainly, I am more familiar with ASP controls. Anyway, much to learn! Thanks for your input on Dark Table!
GR
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Yes, I did check out DxO and it does cost a bit for sure. I have downloaded Dark Table and am learning how to use it. ASP is a familiar program as I started using it when it was Bibble. I have tried the new trial version of ASP2 64bit and basically liked it, especially its new found speed and stability. Other than a few other changes though, I did not see much else. It currently only offers access to a few plug-ins, and does not yet offer the HDR option. Plus, I had hoped to see changes in the highlight controls which I did not see. So, I decided to hold off just a bit to upgrade until at least a few of those issues are resolved. I did ask a question about if one can later switch to 64bit if one downloads the 32bit program of ASP2? If so, I might go ahead and bite the bullet on the program. There is a lot to be said about familiarity of using a program for getting things done. Until then, I will experiment with Dark Table and its b&w modules. Thanks for your input!afx wrote:Nostalgia still works in 32bit AS2.
Much cheaper than DxO and other commercial packages with easily the same results.
And for quick work on an already adjusted color image, nothing beats Silikon Bonk (the name describes it already, it is Bernd's professional experience put into silicone).
Having said that, I also use the LR color adjustments in BW with a bit of clarity and contrast to achieve nice results. The more I work with digital BW, the less rely on plugins.
cheers
afx
Thanks to everyone for all their inputs and suggestions. I really appreciated it!
Cheers!
GR
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 1:38 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- Video Card: FirePro 4900
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: NEC PA301w, ColorMunki
- Location: München
- Contact:
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Sure.grcolts wrote:Question, if one purchases the 32bit version of ASP2, can you later freely switch to 64 bit when more plug-ins become available?
I have installed them in parallel on all my boxes.
cheers
afx
Send bugs to the Monkey // AfterShot Kickstart Guide // sRGB clipping sucks and Adobe RGB is just as bad
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
Bibble since 2005 // W7 64 on quad Phenom // Ubuntu 14.4 on quad i7 and dualcore AMD // Images
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
It's sad one has to search for other software when ASP might be so powerful and enough !grcolts wrote:Yes, I did check out DxO and it does cost a bit for sure. I have downloaded Dark Table and am learning how to use it.afx wrote:Nostalgia still works in 32bit AS2.
Much cheaper than DxO and other commercial packages with easily the same results.
.../...
afx

I gave DT a try too, and unfortunately for me couldn't find anything better than in ASP. Even my lenses aren't calibrated in DT (except my 24-70 2.8 AFS, but ASP supports it too).
May I ? Well, I think the HDR as proposed in ASP is nothing more than a big frustrating joke ! They ought to make it a plugin, not a standalone program with almost no relation with ASP !grcolts wrote:ASP is a familiar program as I started using it when it was Bibble. I have tried the new trial version of ASP2 64bit and basically liked it, especially its new found speed and stability. Other than a few other changes though, I did not see much else. It currently only offers access to a few plug-ins, and does not yet offer the HDR option.
The way it has to be used as of today is painful : one has to invoke an external program (even if from inside ASP) that does its whole job outside and regardless to ASP, then saves a jpg as a result.

Then one has to load the picture and hope work on it ? But the chain was broken at its source, what can one expect from that ?
I hope corel will make it part of ASP as a plugin and insert it into the pipe, so one can apply any effect afterwards with no quality loss. But, first, let them fix the many bugs ans shortcomings that prevent ASP from being as efficient as it ought to (demosaizing, printing on linux, HighLights recovery, keywords management, etc.). Then, they can offer us extra functions.
J.-L.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 11:41 pm
- System_Drive: N/A
- 32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
- processor: 2.5 ghz intel core i5
- ram: 8gb
- Video Card: Radeon HD
- sound_card: apple
- Hard_Drive_Capacity: 500gb
- Monitor/Display Make & Model: 21.5 Imac
Re: Alternative B&W Processing
Yes, I did check out DxO and it does cost a bit for sure. I have downloaded Dark Table and am learning how to use it.[/quote]
It's sad one has to search for other software when ASP might be so powerful and enough !
I gave DT a try too, and unfortunately for me couldn't find anything better than in ASP. Even my lenses aren't calibrated in DT (except my 24-70 2.8 AFS, but ASP supports it too).
The way it has to be used as of today is painful : one has to invoke an external program (even if from inside ASP) that does its whole job outside and regardless to ASP, then saves a jpg as a result.
Then one has to load the picture and hope work on it ? But the chain was broken at its source, what can one expect from that ?
I hope corel will make it part of ASP as a plugin and insert it into the pipe, so one can apply any effect afterwards with no quality loss. But, first, let them fix the many bugs ans shortcomings that prevent ASP from being as efficient as it ought to (demosaizing, printing on linux, HighLights recovery, keywords management, etc.). Then, they can offer us extra functions.
J.-L.[/quote]
Well, hopefully, the HDR will be tweaked to work better. HDR, for me, is little used so that is not a big deal breaker for me. It is fun to play with but is nothing I would use in my normal workflow. I have had a chance to play with Darktable and Light Zone. DT has lots of features for sure and I could see myself using some of those modules but the one problem I have had with it on my Mac is that the program locks up and I have to force quit the program. I even tried installing and reinstalling the program and ended up with the same results. There seems to be a bug in their light table section as this is where the program goes into a working mode and never leaves it. So, I have deleted the program from my HD. Light Zone on the other hand works very well. Not sure if I quite understand yet exactly how it works as I have not been able to get very pleasing results from it. The program looks like it would be very good for b&w as it uses the zone system. My problem right now, is figuring out how to tweak it to get the results I want. So far I have not been pleased with it. Certainly, LZ has capabilities but I don't see it replacing ASP by any means.
GR
It's sad one has to search for other software when ASP might be so powerful and enough !

I gave DT a try too, and unfortunately for me couldn't find anything better than in ASP. Even my lenses aren't calibrated in DT (except my 24-70 2.8 AFS, but ASP supports it too).
May I ? Well, I think the HDR as proposed in ASP is nothing more than a big frustrating joke ! They ought to make it a plugin, not a standalone program with almost no relation with ASP !grcolts wrote:ASP is a familiar program as I started using it when it was Bibble. I have tried the new trial version of ASP2 64bit and basically liked it, especially its new found speed and stability. Other than a few other changes though, I did not see much else. It currently only offers access to a few plug-ins, and does not yet offer the HDR option.
The way it has to be used as of today is painful : one has to invoke an external program (even if from inside ASP) that does its whole job outside and regardless to ASP, then saves a jpg as a result.

Then one has to load the picture and hope work on it ? But the chain was broken at its source, what can one expect from that ?
I hope corel will make it part of ASP as a plugin and insert it into the pipe, so one can apply any effect afterwards with no quality loss. But, first, let them fix the many bugs ans shortcomings that prevent ASP from being as efficient as it ought to (demosaizing, printing on linux, HighLights recovery, keywords management, etc.). Then, they can offer us extra functions.
J.-L.[/quote]
Well, hopefully, the HDR will be tweaked to work better. HDR, for me, is little used so that is not a big deal breaker for me. It is fun to play with but is nothing I would use in my normal workflow. I have had a chance to play with Darktable and Light Zone. DT has lots of features for sure and I could see myself using some of those modules but the one problem I have had with it on my Mac is that the program locks up and I have to force quit the program. I even tried installing and reinstalling the program and ended up with the same results. There seems to be a bug in their light table section as this is where the program goes into a working mode and never leaves it. So, I have deleted the program from my HD. Light Zone on the other hand works very well. Not sure if I quite understand yet exactly how it works as I have not been able to get very pleasing results from it. The program looks like it would be very good for b&w as it uses the zone system. My problem right now, is figuring out how to tweak it to get the results I want. So far I have not been pleased with it. Certainly, LZ has capabilities but I don't see it replacing ASP by any means.
GR