Postby mitchell65 on Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:00 pm

erdna wrote: My experience is that it doesn't make any difference in resolution when e.g. zooming is applied.

It does on my HD TV 8)
John Mitchell
We all make mistakes, that's why pencils have erasers on the end!
mitchell65
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:50 pm
Location: Cornwall UK
operating_system: Windows 7 Home Premium
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 64 Bit
motherboard: Dell Inc. 04GJJT A00
processor: 2.80 gigahertz AMD Athlon II X4 630 Quad Core
ram: 4Gb
Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4200
sound_card: Realtek High Definition Audio
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 560Gb Sata

Postby erdna on Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:13 am

I retested on a fullHD TV, and indeed there is a difference. Edges are somewhat sharper, but there is a lot of aliasing, which make e.g. that a text on a banner in the image becomes almost unreadable when VS has to resize the large image. Apparently the oversized image is just being resampled without any Nyquist refiltering. I compaired a 3648x2736 image (straight on the timeline) with its resized (768x560) version on the same timeline. Made a 720x560 MPEG2 video file and played the file on my fullHD monitor through my PowerDVD8 SW player.
erdna
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: Belgium

Image Size

Postby Kenneth Veal on Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:05 am

jpeg ,RGB True colour, 24bit,Width 3071 Height 1838px,Res 28 px/cm,
size 16,537kb
Kenneth Veal
 
Posts: 1007
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 7:21 pm
Location: London,England
operating_system: Windows XP Home
System_Drive: C
32bit or 64bit: 32 Bit
motherboard: ASRock 939NF6G-VSTA PCI-Express
processor: 4200+ 2.20 gigahertz AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core
ram: 4GB
Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 4650 PCI Express 1GB GDDR2 mem.
sound_card: Creative Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS Pro
Hard_Drive_Capacity: 1037 GB
Monitor/Display Make & Model: AOC

Postby Trevor Andrew on Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:18 am

Hi Erdna

erdna wrote: I compaired a 3648x2736 image (straight on the timeline) with its resized (768x560) version on the same timeline. .


With these images in the timeline, use pan and zoom on each, compare the difference in the timeline.
Trevor Andrew
 

Postby erdna on Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:55 am

With pan and zoom it's even worse. an extra strong flicker on the characters becomes visible. Is there a way to post my .jpeg files (the original pic and the presized) so that other people can do a test?
erdna
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby erdna on Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:07 pm

I uploaded the 2 files in http://users.telenet.be/bettydemey/
erdna
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby erdna on Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:22 pm

I now added screenshots of the result ( not yet pan/zoomed) in an mpeg2 file played back with PDVD8.
erdna
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby erdna on Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:17 pm

Finally I found out that if you don't apply pan/scan on an oversized image it is being rendered without the right filtering, thereby causing aliasing. If pan/scan is being applied and the file rendered, the end result is indeed significantly better. (resolution). I now also uploaded the "problem" .mpg file where the pre-sized, and the oversized image clips were rendered without pan/scan applied. My conclusion is thus, to never use oversized image clips if there is no P/S involved.
erdna
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 5:10 pm
Location: Belgium

Postby Trevor Andrew on Tue Dec 22, 2009 12:43 pm

Hi erdna

Sorry for the delay in replying and thanks for the info and sample clips.
Interesting result.
In the past I have always used sizes to match the video frame, only recently increasing (double size) for my slide shows.
I don¡¦t use Pan & Zoom that much so will be taking a good look at the next slide show.

By the way I noticed you used interlaced video, have you try Frame Based for your slide shows.
I realise with video included we would use interlaced. Just a thought.
Trevor Andrew
 

Previous

Return to VideoStudio

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests